2 hrs ago

Kotak Says Mid-Cap Rebalancing Erodes Historical Investment Relevance

Kotak Says Mid-Cap Rebalancing Erodes Historical Investment Relevance
Constant rebalancing destroys the historical relevance of mid-cap indices, Kotak explains in its strategy note · livemint.com

Kotak studied how useful mid-cap stock indexes are for investors.

It said these indexes change their companies often because share prices move.

The Nifty Midcap 150 has 150 companies, but many different companies entered and left it over time.

Only 46 companies stayed in the index throughout the period Kotak examined.

This makes it harder to compare today’s index with its past performance.

A few popular industries can also become unusually large parts of the index.

This means the performance of those industries can strongly affect the whole index.

Kotak therefore said broad earnings and valuation comparisons may not be very useful for this index.

Key facts

Index examined
Nifty Midcap 150
Index size
150 companies selected by free-float market capitalisation
Consistent constituents
46 stocks were part of the index continuously from FY22 through the first half of FY27
Unique constituents
275 different stocks were included during FY22-FY26
Sector concentration
Seven different sectors ranked among the index’s top three sectors by weight across 10 half-year periods
Return contribution
The top three sectors contributed 34% to 152% of index returns in six positive half-year periods
Report date
19 September

Quotes

Kotak Institutional Equities

Institutional equities research and strategy division of Kotak Securities

“Top-down earnings and valuation exercises have little relevance given (1) frequent and constant changes to the composition of the indices, (2) dominance of one or a few sectors or themes at most times, and (3) exaggerated movements in sectors and stocks due to frequent emergence and demise of sentiment-driven popular ‘narratives’.”
livemint.com
“The constant churn in the indices makes them irrelevant for any meaningful historical comparisons such as future earnings growth with historical earnings growth, and future multiples with historical multiples.”
livemint.com

Sources

Related news