6 days ago
Countries Fall Short of UN Biodiversity Protection Targets
Nearly 200 countries agreed to protect 30% of the world’s land and seas by 2030.
This plan is called “30 by 30.”
New research says countries are making progress, but not fast enough.
About 20% of land and 10% of marine areas are currently covered by protection measures.
Current promises could increase those figures to 26% and 13% by 2030.
Countries also promised to help provide $200 billion each year for biodiversity.
Researchers say there is still a yearly funding gap of $75 billion to $150 billion.
They also warn that putting an area on a map does not always mean it is truly protected.
Protected areas have expanded by 1.3 million square kilometres on land and 6 million square kilometres at sea since the agreement began.
Current protection covers about 20% of land and inland waters and 10% of marine areas.
Existing government pledges could raise coverage to 26% on land and 13% in marine ecosystems by 2030.
The annual biodiversity funding shortfall is estimated at $75 billion to $150 billion.
Researchers warned that only 3.5% of ocean areas covered by protection plans are effectively protected.
- Who
- Nearly 200 countries, environmental groups, and the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity are involved.
- What
- Research found that governments are likely to miss the 2030 goal of protecting 30% of the world’s land and seas.
- Where
- The goal applies worldwide; the report was datelined Singapore, and an official progress report is due at a conference in Yerevan, Armenia.
- When
- The findings were reported on September 23, with the target deadline set for 2030.
- Why
- Progress is considered too slow, and major gaps remain in funding and the effective protection of designated areas.
Progress Is Being Made
Action Remains Insufficient
Expansion of protected areas
Progress Is Being Made
Researchers acknowledged that 1.3 million square kilometres of land and 6 million square kilometres of marine areas have come under formal protection since the agreement took effect.
Action Remains Insufficient
Environmental groups said total coverage remains well below the 30% goal, reaching only about 20% on land and 10% at sea.
Government commitments
Progress Is Being Made
If existing government pledges are fulfilled, protection could reach 26% of terrestrial and inland water areas and 13% of marine ecosystems by 2030.
Action Remains Insufficient
The projected figures would still fall short of the target, and the United Nations warned that implementation is not occurring at the required pace and scale.
Protection in practice
Progress Is Being Made
Formal protection plans provide a framework for conserving ecosystems and represent progress toward the global agreement.
Action Remains Insufficient
WWF International said protection on paper does not necessarily mean protection in the water; only 3.5% of the ocean currently covered by protection plans was considered effectively protected.
Key facts
- Global target
- Protect and conserve at least 30% of the world’s land and seas by 2030.
- Current land coverage
- About 20% of terrestrial and inland water areas are protected.
- Current marine coverage
- About 10% of marine areas are covered by protection plans.
- Projected coverage from existing pledges
- About 26% on land and 13% in marine ecosystems by 2030.
- Annual funding shortfall
- Estimated at approximately $75 billion to $150 billion.
- Marine protection spending
- About $1.8 billion is spent annually, compared with $16 billion identified as necessary.
- Biodiversity funding pledge
- Countries pledged to mobilise at least $200 billion annually.
Quotes
Astrid Schomaker
Executive secretary of the UN Convention on Biological Diversity
“Progress is being made clearly, but it is uneven, and it is clearly also not at the pace and scale required to achieve the Framework’s 23 targets by 2030”
theprint.in
Pauli Merriman
Senior director for oceans at WWF International
“There’s a significant gap between protection on paper and protection in practice. A line on a map does not mean protection in the water”
theprint.in






