1 hr ago

Maharashtra Rights Panel Notices Pune Police Over Custodial Torture

Maharashtra Rights Panel Notices Pune Police Over Custodial Torture
Maharashtra Human Rights Commission Issues Notices To Pune CP, 11 Police Personnel Over Alleged Custodial Torture · freepressjournal.in

A human-rights commission is investigating how Pune police treated a 20-year-old accused person.

The complaints say he was taken into custody and paraded through busy streets.

They also say he was allegedly physically mistreated and insulted in front of people.

The Commission said police appeared to punish him publicly instead of using normal legal procedures.

It believes senior police officers may have failed to prevent this.

The Pune police commissioner did not submit a report when asked.

The Commission has now given the officers a chance to explain their side and present evidence.

The cases will be heard again on September 9, 2026.

Key facts

Issuing body
Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission
Officials notified
Pune Commissioner of Police Amitesh Kumar, DCP Chilumula Rajnikant and 10 other police personnel
Person identified in complaints
Sultan Rehman Shaikh, a 20-year-old accused
Allegations
Public parading, custodial torture, verbal abuse, forced squatting and a public apology
Reports received
Two reports were received by email on July 29, 2026
Legal provision
Notices were issued under Section 16 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993
Next hearing
September 9, 2026, before a Division Bench

Quotes

Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission

The state human rights body investigating the complaints

“The fact that the Commissioner of Police, Pune, despite receipt of notice of these cases has chosen not to file his reply/report goes to show that he has accepted all the allegations made in both these complaints.”
freepressjournal.in
“The complaints as well as the photographs annexed to the complaints reveals that the Police Department of Pune had virtually imposed physical punishment to the victim instead of following due process of law.”
freepressjournal.in

Sources

Related news