1 hr ago
Philippine Senate Lowers Conviction Threshold in Duterte Impeachment Trial
The Philippine Senate is acting as a court in Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial.
Senators decided that only judges who can take part in the trial should count when calculating the votes needed for conviction.
This lowered the number of votes needed from 16 to 14.
Thirteen lawmakers supported the change, while one opposed it and six did not take part.
Four senator-judges have been unable to participate because of legal actions involving some of them.
Duterte is accused of misusing public money, having unexplained wealth and threatening President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and others.
She denies wrongdoing and says she will take part in the trial carefully.
If convicted, she could be barred from holding political office and would not be able to run for president in 2028.
The Philippine Senate ruled that only senator-judges able to participate should count toward the conviction threshold.
The decision reduced the votes needed to convict Vice President Sara Duterte from 16 to 14.
Thirteen lawmakers supported the ruling, one opposed it, and six did not participate.
Four of the 24 senator-judges have been unable to participate because of legal actions involving some of them.
Duterte faces allegations involving public funds, unexplained wealth and threats against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and others.
- Who
- The Philippine Senate, sitting as an impeachment court, and Vice President Sara Duterte are central to the proceedings.
- What
- Senators lowered the number of votes required to convict Duterte from 16 to 14.
- Where
- The proceedings took place in Manila, Philippines.
- When
- The ruling was reported on Wednesday, September 23; the articles do not specify the year.
- Why
- The Senate counted only senator-judges able to participate when determining the two-thirds conviction threshold.
Supporters of the Lower Threshold
Duterte’s Defense
How the conviction threshold should be calculated
Supporters of the Lower Threshold
Supporters argue that only senator-judges able to participate should be counted, making 14 votes sufficient for conviction.
Duterte’s Defense
Duterte’s lawyers said she would seek a fair and impartial trial, participate cautiously and reserve the right to pursue all available legal remedies.
Implications of the ruling
Supporters of the Lower Threshold
Analysts said the decision gives prosecutors their best chance to secure a conviction and could offer an indication of how the final vote might develop.
Duterte’s Defense
Duterte’s defense maintains that she does not fear the outcome and has denied wrongdoing in the allegations against her.
Key facts
- Conviction threshold before ruling
- 16 votes
- Conviction threshold after ruling
- 14 votes
- Senator-judges
- 24 total; four have been unable to participate
- Vote on threshold change
- 13 in favor, one against, and six not participating
- Impeachment allegations
- Misuse of public funds, unexplained wealth and threats against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., the first lady and a former House Speaker
- Potential consequence
- A conviction would bar Duterte from holding political office and prevent her from running for president
- Duterte's response
- She denies wrongdoing; her lawyers said she would participate cautiously and pursue available legal remedies
Quotes
Michael Henry Yusingco
Senior research fellow at the Ateneo Policy Center in Manila
“does not shrink from accountability, nor does she fear the outcome of this impeachment trial”
theprint.in
“This is the best chance to secure a conviction”
theprint.in
Ederson Tapia
Public administration professor at the University of Makati
“The vote may also offer a glimpse of how the final (impeachment) voting could go, although nothing is assured at this time. Senators still have to weigh the evidence, and, admittedly, weigh public opinion. But if I were Vice President Duterte, I would be concerned.”
theprint.in






