1 week ago
Report Accusing India of China Transshipment Lacks Proof
The White House published a report about goods from China allegedly being sent through other countries before reaching the United States.
India was included on a list of more than 40 countries.
A magazine article says the report does not show clear evidence that India helped commit fraud.
It does not name an Indian company or identify a specific shipment.
Goods moving through another country are not automatically involved in wrongdoing.
Fraud would require falsely claiming where the goods were made to avoid tariffs.
India said it would study the report carefully.
It also said that violations of customs and export rules would be handled under Indian law.
A White House report listed India among more than 40 countries allegedly helping China reroute exports to the United States.
The Saviour article says the report provides no Indian company, shipment, importer, vessel, container, or bill of lading as evidence.
It argues that transshipment is not fraud unless a product’s true country of origin is falsely declared to avoid tariffs.
The article cites research showing Vietnam’s alleged rerouting share fell from 16.1% to 1.8% under stricter company-level matching.
India’s Ministry of External Affairs said it would study the report’s methodology and enforce existing customs and export laws.
- Who
- The White House, India’s Ministry of External Affairs, Peter Navarro, and the Saviour article by KBS Sindhu are central to the account.
- What
- A White House report alleged that India and more than 40 other countries helped facilitate Chinese export transshipment to the United States; the article disputes the evidence presented against India.
- Where
- The allegations concern trade routes involving China, India, and the United States; the report refers to India’s Pune-Gujarat-Chennai production belt.
- When
- The report was released on August 13, and India’s response was given at an August 14 media briefing.
- Why
- The report addresses alleged rerouting of Chinese exports to avoid United States tariffs, while the article argues that the document does not establish specific wrongdoing by India or Indian industry.
White House Report Allegations
Indian and Article-Based Response
Evidence of transshipment
White House Report Allegations
The White House report placed India among countries allegedly helping China route exports to the United States.
Indian and Article-Based Response
The Saviour article says the report does not provide a specific Indian company, shipment, route, or shipping document proving the allegation.
Meaning of transshipment
White House Report Allegations
The report presents rerouting through third countries as a significant issue connected to tariff avoidance, according to the article’s account.
Indian and Article-Based Response
The article says transshipment is ordinary cargo movement and becomes fraud only when the product’s country of origin is falsely declared to evade tariffs.
Responsibility for violations
White House Report Allegations
The report’s framing links alleged rerouting activity to countries through which Chinese exports may have passed.
Indian and Article-Based Response
The article argues that any misdeclaration should be addressed against specific importers under United States law and does not by itself implicate the Indian government or Indian industry as a whole.
Key facts
- Report title
- The Great Transhipment Scam: Rise, Scope, and Costs
- Issuing office
- White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy
- Release date
- August 13
- Countries listed
- More than 40 countries, including India
- Evidence criticized
- The article says no Indian company, importer, exporter, freight forwarder, vessel, container number, or bill of lading was identified.
- India’s response
- The Ministry of External Affairs said it would study the findings and methodology in detail.
- Relevant example
- The article says Vietnam’s apparent rerouting share fell from 16.1% to 1.8% when the same firm, rather than only the same tariff code and quarter, was required.
Quotes
MEA spokesperson
Spokesperson for India’s Ministry of External Affairs
“We would like to study the findings and the methodology that has been adopted in detail. We have robust laws and procedures governing customs, rules of origin and exports, and any instances of violation that may be there are dealt with in accordance with law.”
thehansindia.com
Sources
Related news
White House Puts India in Top China Transshipment Risk Tier
US Names India in $67 Billion Transshipment Scam Report
US Report Accuses India of Transshipping Chinese Goods
White House Report Names India in China Shadow Transhipment Network
India to study US transshipment report, rejects Washington role claims
