2 weeks ago

High Court: Rs 22,000 Army family maintenance not shockingly high

High Court: Rs 22,000 Army family maintenance not shockingly high
Rs 22,000 maintenance for Army man’s wife, children ‘not high’: Chhattisgarh High Court · indianexpress.com

A man who works for the Army did not want to pay money to help take care of his wife and two children.

He said the children were not his and asked for a special test to prove it.

A family court had earlier said he must pay Rs 22,000 every month to support them.

The man went to a higher court called the Chhattisgarh High Court to complain.

The judge said the amount was fair because the man earns about Rs 76,000 every month and also gets money from farmland.

The court also said the wife stays at home and does not have her own income.

The children are four years old and two years old.

The court decided the man should pay Rs 10,000 for his wife, Rs 7,000 for one child, and Rs 5,000 for the other child.

The judge said the money is needed for food, medicine, and school.

So the man has to keep paying the money to help his family.

Key facts

Total monthly maintenance upheld
Rs 22,000
Husband's gross monthly salary
Rs 76,701
Maintenance breakdown
Rs 10,000 (wife), Rs 7,000 (4-year-old son), Rs 5,000 (2-year-old son)
Family court order date
October 25, 2024
High court order date
August 6, 2026
Interim maintenance (2021)
Rs 15,000 per month
Agricultural income
Rs 50,000-60,000 per year from 3-4 acres of ancestral land
Court
Chhattisgarh High Court, Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha

Quotes

Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha

Chief Justice of Chhattisgarh High Court

“Considering the submission advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, materials available on record and also considering the price index and medical expenses, the total amount awarded to the respondents (wife and children) cannot be said to be shockingly on higher side warranting interference by this court in the present revision petition.”
indianexpress.com

Husband

Army employee and husband of the wife

“I could not be made to pay maintenance for the two children, whom I claimed were not my.”
indianexpress.com

Sources

Related news