1 week ago

Supreme Court Rejects Badal Plea in AKJ Defamation Case

Supreme Court Rejects Badal Plea in AKJ Defamation Case
Supreme Court Rejects Sukhbir Singh Badal’s Plea to Quash Defamation Case Over AKJ-BKI Remarks · republicworld.com

The Supreme Court decided that a defamation case against Sukhbir Singh Badal should continue.

The case is about comments allegedly made during the 2017 Punjab election campaign.

Badal was accused of linking the Akhand Kirtani Jatha, or AKJ, to Babbar Khalsa International.

Rajinder Pal Singh said the comments hurt his reputation.

Badal’s lawyer said Badal never called Singh the AKJ’s spokesperson.

The lawyer also questioned whether newspaper reports were enough evidence.

A judge said the complaint materials appeared to identify Singh as the spokesperson.

The Supreme Court therefore dismissed Badal’s request to stop the case.

This decision does not itself determine whether Badal is guilty of defamation.

Key facts

Case
Sukhbir Singh Badal v. Rajinder Pal Singh
Supreme Court bench
Justices Dipankar Datta and Sheel Nagu
Complaint
Criminal defamation complaint filed by Rajinder Pal Singh
Alleged statement
The AKJ was described as the “political front” of Babbar Khalsa International
Earlier proceedings
A Chandigarh magistrate summoned Badal, and the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed his challenge in October 2025
Badal’s counsel
Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal
Organizations involved
Akhand Kirtani Jatha and Babbar Khalsa International

Quotes

Justice Dipankar Datta

Supreme Court judge on the bench hearing Badal’s petition

“This is reporting. Reporters are saying that I said. Your Lordships should not stretch this and put this in my mouth.”
republicworld.com
“The difficulty is you recognise him and say he is the spokesperson.”
republicworld.com

Sources

Related news