2 hrs ago
Supreme Court Quashes Afroz’s NSA Detention, Orders ₹10 Lakh Cost
The Supreme Court examined the detention of Mulla Afroz in connection with violence in Sambhal.
Afroz had been held under a law called the National Security Act.
Authorities relied heavily on an alleged confession made outside court.
The Supreme Court said such a confession can be considered, but it cannot be the only important reason for preventive detention.
Officials must also examine other relevant facts.
The Court found that this had not happened properly in Afroz’s case.
It therefore cancelled his detention order.
The Court also ordered the Uttar Pradesh government to pay ₹10 lakh in costs.
The Allahabad High Court had earlier supported the detention.
The Supreme Court quashed Mulla Afroz’s detention under the National Security Act in the Sambhal violence case.
The Court ruled that an extra-judicial confession cannot be the sole basis for preventive detention.
It said detaining authorities must consider other relevant circumstances before ordering detention.
Afroz was detained after violence during a court-ordered survey of the Shahi Jama Masjid in November 2024.
The Court imposed ₹10 lakh in costs on the Uttar Pradesh government after finding the detention order unsustainable.
- Who
- The Supreme Court, Mulla Afroz, and the Uttar Pradesh government were involved; the case also concerned orders by the Sambhal District Magistrate and the Allahabad High Court.
- What
- The Supreme Court quashed Afroz’s detention under the National Security Act and imposed ₹10 lakh in costs on the Uttar Pradesh government.
- Where
- The case arose in Sambhal, Uttar Pradesh, and was decided by the Supreme Court in New Delhi.
- When
- The violence occurred in November 2024; Afroz was arrested on January 17, 2025, and the detention order was issued on October 13, 2025. The Supreme Court ruling was delivered on Tuesday.
- Why
- The Court found that the detaining authority had wrongly relied on material that did not legally justify preventive detention, including an alleged extra-judicial confession.
Afroz’s Challenge
State’s Defense
Sufficiency of detention material
Afroz’s Challenge
Afroz argued that the material relied upon by the authorities was insufficient and that the case substantially rested on an alleged extra-judicial confession.
State’s Defense
The Uttar Pradesh government relied on investigation material and alleged that Afroz had helped instigate the crowd and could disturb public order.
Role of judicial review
Afroz’s Challenge
The Supreme Court found that the material considered by the detaining authority could not sustain the detention.
State’s Defense
The Allahabad High Court held that the authority had considered the material supplied to Afroz and that courts should review whether the authority applied its mind, rather than reassess the material’s sufficiency.
Key facts
- Detained person
- Mulla Afroz
- Detention law
- Section 3(2) of the National Security Act
- Detention order
- Issued by the Sambhal District Magistrate on October 13, 2025
- Arrest date
- January 17, 2025
- Related incident
- Sambhal violence during a court-ordered survey of the Shahi Jama Masjid in November 2024
- Supreme Court outcome
- Detention quashed and ₹10 lakh costs imposed on the Uttar Pradesh government
- Earlier ruling
- The Allahabad High Court had upheld the detention
Sources
Related news
High Court Quashes Chaudhary’s NSA Detention, Orders ₹5 Lakh Compensation
High Court Quashes PSA Detention of Srinagar Resident
Supreme Court Stays Compensation Order Against Noida District Magistrate
Allahabad High Court Quashes Activist’s NSA Detention in Noida
UP Official Challenges Quashing of Student’s NSA Detention
Questions Grow Over Supreme Court Roster and Hearing Transparency
Wangchuk Backs Electoral Accountability, Demands Answers on Ladakh Violence
Supreme Court stays penalties against Noida officials in NSA case
Questions Over Noida DM Case Listing Before Junior Bench
