1 hr ago
Karnataka Finance Department Warns Against Major Projects Amid Fiscal Constraints
Karnataka is considering a rural road project that could cost Rs 10,000 crore.
The state’s Finance Department said there is not enough clearly available money for it yet.
It warned that the state already has large debts, unpaid bills and many ongoing projects.
The department also said drought may increase spending on farmers, drinking water and electricity subsidies.
It suggested waiting until the government knows how the project will be funded.
Chief Minister D K Shivakumar said the warning was meant to protect the government’s interests.
He said the government must continue helping people and farmers through its welfare schemes.
Opposition leader R Ashoka said the government was making expensive announcements without enough money.
The proposal will still be placed before the Cabinet with the Finance Department’s concerns.
The Karnataka Finance Department cautioned against starting the proposed Rs 10,000 crore Chief Minister’s Rural Road Connectivity Scheme without identified funding.
It projected a 2.95 per cent fiscal deficit and cited a Rs 22,957 crore revenue deficit for 2026-27.
The department said Karnataka’s liabilities-to-GSDP ratio had reached 24.94 per cent, leaving limited borrowing space.
It warned that funding the project could require reallocating money from other departments and delay ongoing works.
Chief Minister D K Shivakumar defended the government’s priorities, while Opposition leader R Ashoka accused it of risking a fiscal crisis.
- Who
- The Karnataka Finance Department, Chief Minister D K Shivakumar and Opposition leader R Ashoka are central to the report.
- What
- The Finance Department cautioned against proceeding with a proposed Rs 10,000 crore rural road connectivity project without clearer funding.
- Where
- Karnataka, with the report datelined Bengaluru.
- When
- The report was datelined September 22; the project is proposed for 2026-27 and 2027-28.
- Why
- The department cited limited fiscal space, existing financial commitments, drought-related costs and insufficient identified resources.
Government and Finance Department
Opposition criticism
Whether to proceed with the road project
Government and Finance Department
The Finance Department advised waiting for greater clarity on available resources and the project’s funding arrangement. Shivakumar said the government would decide which programmes to cut and would adhere to fiscal-deficit limits.
Opposition criticism
R Ashoka said the project and other announcements reflected poor financial management and accused the Congress government of pushing Karnataka toward a fiscal crisis.
How to prioritize spending
Government and Finance Department
Shivakumar defended the five Guarantee schemes, saying they help people and farmers cope with price rises and drought. The Finance Department warned that a new project could require reallocations that delay ongoing works.
Opposition criticism
Ashoka argued that major announcements were being made despite what he described as empty coffers and a severe liquidity problem.
Key facts
- Proposed project
- Chief Minister’s Rural Road Connectivity Scheme
- Estimated cost
- Rs 10,000 crore
- Proposed execution period
- 2026-27 and 2027-28
- Projected fiscal deficit
- 2.95 per cent of GSDP in 2026-27
- Revenue deficit
- Rs 22,957 crore
- Liabilities-to-GSDP ratio
- 24.94 per cent
- Pending bills
- Rs 36,136 crore across four major departments
- Guarantee schemes allocation
- Estimated Rs 51,286 crore in the current fiscal
Quotes
Karnataka Finance Department
The state department assessing the proposed rural road project and Karnataka’s fiscal position.
“The CM’s grand project announcements are nothing more than optics and hogwash. While the CM goes on an unbridled announcement spree, his own Finance Department has issued a reality check, urging him to be realistic as Karnataka faces an unprecedented liquidity crunch and financial collapse.”
theprint.in
“It would be prudent to be realistic regarding the funding envelope that is available and not to add further to the overhang of pending balance cost of works.”
theprint.in









