3 days ago

HARERA Orders Raheja Developers to Refund Gurugram Shop Investment

HARERA Orders Raheja Developers to Refund Gurugram Shop Investment
Gurugram couple invested ₹50 lakh in a shop in 2017; 9 years later, RERA orders refund— here’s why · livemint.com

A couple bought a shop in a Gurugram project as an investment.

They hoped it would provide income later in life.

They paid almost all of the agreed price, more than ₹50 lakh.

The builder promised to hand over the shop by January 2024.

The couple said the project was still unfinished after that deadline.

They complained to the Haryana real estate authority.

The authority said the builder had not properly responded to the case.

It ordered the builder to return their money with interest.

The builder has 90 days to make the payment.

Key facts

Property
A 578.99-square-foot commercial shop on the first floor of Raheja Trinity, Sector 84
Total sale consideration
₹52.98 lakh
Amount paid
₹50,49,890, or more than 95% of the agreed price
Possession promise
48 months plus a 12-month grace period, ending January 15, 2024
Refund ordered
₹50,49,890
Interest rate
10.80% annually, based on State Bank of India’s 8.80% MCLR plus 2%
Payment deadline
Within 90 days of the order

Quotes

Rohit Singh and Garima Sachan

The buyers who complained about the stalled Gurugram commercial project

“To the utter shock and dismay of the complainants… there was nothing on the ground i.e. the builder has not even completed the first phase of construction and… the construction was at halt and no one was present on the site.”
livemint.com
“I found out about the order only on Wednesday. But I am happy that the authority gave us full compensation for the delay. The project is still nowhere near complete, I believe.”
livemint.com

Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority

The authority hearing the buyers’ dispute with Raheja Developers

“Despite giving specific directions to file a reply, it has failed to comply with the orders of the authority. It shows that the respondent is intentionally avoiding filing… written reply. Therefore, the defence of the respondent is hereby struck off.”
livemint.com

Sources

Related news