1 hr ago
Second Supreme Court Petition Filed Against Election Chief Gyanesh Kumar
A second legal petition has been filed against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.
The petition was filed in the Supreme Court.
The article says other petitions are also being filed in different courts.
It questions actions connected with the election authorities.
It also discusses an earlier voter-list review in Bengal called the SIR.
The writer says the Supreme Court allowed that process to continue before an election.
The article claims that many voter deletions later became difficult to ignore.
It quotes Justice Joymalya Bagchi saying people who could not vote then might vote in the next election.
A second petition has reportedly been filed in the Supreme Court against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.
The report says several petitions are being filed in High Courts and the Supreme Court challenging actions associated with Kumar.
The article criticizes what it describes as the progressive centralisation of power.
It recalls that the Supreme Court enabled the Special Intensive Revision in Bengal before an election.
Justice Joymalya Bagchi was quoted as saying that voters unable to vote “this time” could vote next time.
- Who
- Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, petitioners, the Supreme Court, and Justice Joymalya Bagchi.
- What
- A second petition was filed in the Supreme Court against actions associated with Gyanesh Kumar.
- Where
- The Supreme Court; the article also refers to Bengal and High Courts.
- When
- Why
- The petitions challenge actions of the Chief Election Commissioner, while the article raises concerns about centralisation of power and voter deletions.
Key facts
- Petition status
- The article reports that a second petition has been filed in the Supreme Court.
- Respondent
- Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar
- Other courts mentioned
- High Courts and the Supreme Court
- Earlier process
- The article refers to the Special Intensive Revision, or SIR, in Bengal.
- Judicial observation
- Justice Joymalya Bagchi was quoted saying those unable to vote “this time” could vote next time.
- Main concern raised
- The article describes a progressive centralisation of power and raises concerns about mass voter deletions.
Quotes
Unidentified speaker
An unidentified person commenting on petitions concerning the Chief Election Commissioner and judicial proceedings.
“Several petitions are now being filed in the High Courts and the Supreme Court “against” the actions of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.”
timesnownews.com
Sources
Related news
Plea Seeks Prosecution of CEC Gyanesh Kumar Over ECI Decisions
Petitioner Seeks Probe Into Election Commission Decisions Under Gyanesh Kumar
Congress Escalates Campaign Against Election Chief Gyanesh Kumar
Opposition demands CEC removal after reported Election Commission dissent
Opposition Demands CEC Gyanesh Kumar’s Removal Over SIR Dissent
Maharashtra SIR Challenged in Bombay High Court, Voters Seek Restoration
Congress Escalates Attack on CEC Over Citizenship Checks
YSRCP Weighs Opposition Shift as Andhra Local Polls Near
Nadda Attacks Congress, INDIA Bloc Over Electoral Roll Revision
Sunil Sharma Rejects Omar Abdullah’s Jammu and Kashmir Statehood Resolution
