3 weeks ago
Supreme Court Refuses to Relax Ashish Mishra's Bail Conditions
An important court in India called the Supreme Court made a decision about a man named Ashish Mishra.
He is the main person accused in a very sad event called the Lakhimpur Kheri violence, which happened in a village in the state of Uttar Pradesh in 2021.
During a protest by farmers, eight people lost their lives.
While waiting for his trial, the court gave Ashish Mishra special rules, called bail conditions, that say where he can travel.
He asked the judges to make the rules easier so he could go to family parties, like his daughters' birthday celebrations.
The judges said no.
They said there was no reason to change the rules at this time.
So Ashish Mishra must keep following the same rules while his trial continues.
The trial in the case is still going on.
The Supreme Court refused to further relax the bail conditions of Ashish Mishra, the prime accused in the 2021 Lakhimpur Kheri violence case.
A bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana dismissed his application, saying there was no ground to entertain the prayer at this stage.
Mishra's counsel said the existing travel restrictions prevented him from attending family functions, including his daughters' birthday celebrations.
Eight people, including four farmers, were killed on October 3, 2021, in Tikunia village during a farmers' protest over the now-repealed agricultural laws and Deputy Chief Minister Keshav Prasad Maurya's visit.
Mishra, son of former Union minister Ajay Kumar Mishra, was granted bail in July 2024 with restrictions to Delhi or Lucknow; the terms were relaxed in May to allow Saturday visits to Lakhimpur Kheri, and he remains on trial.
- Who
- Ashish Mishra, the prime accused in the Lakhimpur Kheri violence case, and the Supreme Court bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana.
- What
- The Supreme Court dismissed Ashish Mishra's application seeking further relaxation of his bail conditions.
- Where
- The Supreme Court of India; the violence occurred in Tikunia village, Lakhimpur Kheri district, Uttar Pradesh.
- When
- Thursday (the court hearing); the violence occurred on October 3, 2021.
- Why
- Mishra sought relaxed bail conditions to attend family functions, including his daughters' birthday celebrations; the court found no ground to entertain the prayer at this stage.
Mishra and his family
Supreme Court and victims' families
Relaxing bail conditions
Mishra and his family
Existing restrictions prevent Ashish Mishra from attending family functions, including his daughters' birthday celebrations, so he sought further relaxation of the conditions.
Supreme Court and victims' families
The Supreme Court found no ground to entertain the request at this stage and dismissed the application.
Grant of bail
Mishra and his family
Mishra repeatedly sought bail and was granted it by the Supreme Court in July 2024, subject to travel restrictions.
Supreme Court and victims' families
Families of those killed challenged his bail in the Supreme Court, which cancelled the Allahabad High Court's bail order in April 2022.
Key facts
- Accused
- Ashish Mishra, son of former Union minister Ajay Kumar Mishra
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Bench
- Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana
- Incident date
- October 3, 2021
- Incident location
- Tikunia village, Lakhimpur Kheri district, Uttar Pradesh
- Fatalities
- Eight people, including four farmers
- Alleged cause of deaths
- Four farmers run over by a sports utility vehicle; a driver, two BJP workers and a journalist killed in ensuing violence
- Decision
- Application dismissed; bail conditions not relaxed
- Current bail terms
- Granted bail in July 2024, restricted to Delhi or Lucknow; May relaxation allows Saturday visits to Lakhimpur Kheri
Quotes
Chief Justice Surya Kant
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
“"Due to the existing restrictions, he is unable to attend family functions, including his daughters' birthday celebrations."”
deccanchronicle.com
“"There is no ground to entertain this prayer at this stage. The application is dismissed."”
deccanchronicle.com











