3 days ago
Panel Links 24 Indore Water Deaths to Sewage Contamination
People in Bhagirathpura, Indore, became ill after sewage contaminated their drinking water.
Thirty-six deaths were reported between December 26, 2025, and February 25, 2026.
A committee led by retired judge Justice Sushil Kumar Gupta investigated what happened.
It said contaminated water was linked to 24 deaths.
In 12 other cases, it could not decide whether the water or other health problems caused the deaths.
The committee blamed six civic officials for administrative failures.
It said an old Narmada pipeline and delays in replacing it allowed contamination risks to continue.
The report reportedly cleared several former commissioners and elected representatives.
The report is still confidential, but lawyers can inspect it and the court is considering the case.
A Justice Sushil Kumar Gupta committee linked 24 of 36 Bhagirathpura deaths to sewage-contaminated drinking water.
The inquiry held six civic officials responsible, citing administrative lapses and delays in replacing an ageing Narmada pipeline.
Twelve deaths could not be conclusively attributed to contaminated water or other health complications.
The report reportedly cleared several former commissioners, elected representatives and the Mayor-in-Council, though the court has not formally ruled on responsibility.
The committee recommended Rs 20 lakh for each deceased person’s family and Rs 5 lakh for other affected victims.
- Who
- The Justice Sushil Kumar Gupta committee investigated the deaths and held six civic officials responsible; 24 deaths were linked to contaminated water.
- What
- A judicial inquiry examined the Bhagirathpura water-contamination tragedy, official responsibility and compensation.
- Where
- Bhagirathpura, Indore, Madhya Pradesh.
- When
- The deaths were reported between December 26, 2025, and February 25, 2026; the High Court heard the case on Tuesday and scheduled the next hearing for September 8.
- Why
- The inquiry attributed the contamination risk to an ageing, leaking Narmada pipeline and delays in replacing it, including delays in the tender process.
Disclosure and Accountability Advocates
Confidentiality and Judicial Review
Public release of the inquiry report
Disclosure and Accountability Advocates
Petitioner Pramod Dwivedi and lawyers representing victims sought public disclosure or copies of the report, with Dwivedi also requesting live-streaming of proceedings.
Confidentiality and Judicial Review
The High Court declined to permit public circulation while the report remains confidential, allowing concerned advocates to inspect it instead.
Responsibility for the deaths
Disclosure and Accountability Advocates
The inquiry reportedly blamed six civic officials for administrative lapses, pipeline risks and delays in the tender process.
Confidentiality and Judicial Review
The findings have not been officially released, and responsibility remains subject to the High Court’s consideration.
Cause of the deaths
Disclosure and Accountability Advocates
The committee linked 24 deaths to contaminated water, while petitioners cited pathogens and medical records describing gastrointestinal infection, diarrhoea and dehydration.
Confidentiality and Judicial Review
For 12 of the 36 cases, the inquiry reportedly could not conclusively determine whether contaminated water or other health complications caused the deaths.
Key facts
- Reported deaths
- 36
- Deaths linked to contaminated water
- 24
- Unresolved death cases
- 12
- Inquiry committee
- Justice Sushil Kumar Gupta committee
- Report length
- 150 pages
- Recommended death compensation
- Rs 20 lakh per family
- Recommended victim compensation
- Rs 5 lakh per affected victim
- Report access
- Public circulation was declined, but concerned advocates may inspect it at the Principal Registrar’s office








