8 hrs ago
Bombay High Court Warns Mallya Over ED Affidavit
The Bombay High Court is hearing Vijay Mallya’s legal case.
The Enforcement Directorate gave Mallya’s lawyers a court document called an affidavit.
Mallya then posted the document on X, according to the agency.
The judge said people should make their arguments in court instead of using social media.
He warned that such posts could make the court’s work less effective.
Mallya’s lawyer promised to pass on the warning.
Mallya wants the criminal cases against him closed because banks recovered money from his assets.
The ED says recovering money does not automatically end allegations of money laundering or loan fraud.
The court will consider the matter again on October 13.
The Bombay High Court reprimanded Vijay Mallya for posting an Enforcement Directorate affidavit on X during ongoing proceedings.
Justice Milind Jadhav said taking the legal dispute to social media could undermine the efficacy of the court and harm Mallya’s case.
The ED said Mallya uploaded the affidavit with derogatory comments after it was emailed to his lawyers on September 8.
Mallya is seeking closure of criminal cases, arguing that lenders recovered more than the original decreed debt from his assets.
The court directed the State Bank of India-led consortium to respond and scheduled the next hearing for October 13.
- Who
- The Bombay High Court, Justice Milind Jadhav, Vijay Mallya, the Enforcement Directorate, and the State Bank of India-led lender consortium.
- What
- The court warned Mallya after the ED said he posted its affidavit on X while pursuing a plea to close criminal cases.
- Where
- The proceedings are before the Bombay High Court in Mumbai, India.
- When
- The warning was issued on September 22, 2026; the affidavit was posted on September 8, and the next hearing is scheduled for October 13.
- Why
- The judge said publicizing documents related to pending proceedings could undermine the court, while Mallya argues that asset recovery justifies ending the criminal cases.
Vijay Mallya’s Position
Enforcement Directorate’s Position
Whether criminal cases should continue
Vijay Mallya’s Position
Mallya argues that the criminal cases should be closed because banks recovered their dues through asset-recovery proceedings.
Enforcement Directorate’s Position
The ED argues that recovering commercial dues does not remove alleged money-laundering liability or end the pending criminal proceedings.
Effect of asset recovery
Vijay Mallya’s Position
Mallya’s lawyer says properties worth approximately Rs 14,131.6 crore were recovered, substantially exceeding the original decreed debt plus interest.
Enforcement Directorate’s Position
The ED says restoration of property under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act is separate from allegations of loan diversion and financial fraud linked to Kingfisher Airlines.
Posting legal documents online
Vijay Mallya’s Position
Mallya’s lawyer assured the court that the warning would be conveyed and noted that the ED had also made posts about Mallya.
Enforcement Directorate’s Position
The ED objected that Mallya posted its affidavit with derogatory comments before the court had reviewed it, while the judge called the conduct serious and potentially harmful to the proceedings.
Key facts
- Judge
- Justice Milind Jadhav
- Affidavit
- The ED said Mallya uploaded its response on X on September 8, after it had been emailed to his legal team.
- Recovered assets
- Properties worth approximately Rs 14,131.6 crore, valued as of August 2021, were handed over to an SBI-led lender consortium.
- Original debt
- Mallya’s lawyer said the recovered amount substantially exceeded the approximately Rs 6,600 crore decreed debt plus interest.
- Allegations
- The ED alleges that at least Rs 3,500 crore was siphoned from Rs 9,000 crore in loans to Kingfisher Airlines.
- Next hearing
- October 13
- Legal status
- A special court declared Mallya a proclaimed offender in November 2016; the articles also describe him as a fugitive economic offender.
Quotes
Justice Milind N Jadhav
Bombay High Court single-judge bench judge
“Please make your client understand this is not the way to do it. Try and understand, what happens is, it undermines the efficacy of the court, because what is shown to me is something which is prima facie serious.”
freepressjournal.in
indianexpress.com
telegraphindia.com
“The problem is he (Mallya) is spoiling his own case otherwise if he is doing like this. He has very competent lawyers in the court to argue the matter.”
indianexpress.com
Sources
Related news
Vijay Mallya Attacks ED, CBI Over Character Assassination Claims
ED Says Mallya Debt Recovery Does Not End Charges
Vijay Mallya Alleges Injustice Over Bank Recovery Claims
Court Orders Meta, X to Preserve Evidence in Defamation Case
UP Police Book Six Handles Over False High Court Claims
Delhi court rejects medical bail plea of former Reliance executive
Customer Disputes Waiter Pocketing Rs 80 Change As Tip
X Expands Transparency Tool to Reveal Government-Ordered Restrictions
X Will Explain When Government Orders Limit Post Reach
Teen Raises Rs 1.5 Lakh Online for Sister’s Eye Surgery
