2 weeks ago
Supreme Court Says Black Money in Polls Undermines Democracy
The Supreme Court of India made an important decision about elections.
It said using 'black money' — money that is hidden from the government — during elections is bad for democracy.
When people vote, their choice should be free and not influenced by money or gifts.
The court gave new rules to stop this.
If police find illegal money during elections, they must tell a senior official within 24 hours.
Police investigations into these cases should finish within one year.
If they take longer, the Election Commission must be told why.
If more than Rs 10 lakh in cash is found during checks, tax authorities must be informed.
The court also wants cases against candidates and lawmakers to be finished quickly.
This all started because of a case about the 2014 elections in Karnataka.
The Supreme Court ruled that black money in the electoral process compromises democracy and the rule of law.
Seizure authorities must report cash or asset seizures to district authorities within 24 hours with written reasons.
Investigations into electoral offences should be completed within a year, with delays reported to the Election Commission of India.
Cash found above Rs 10 lakh by Static Surveillance Teams must be forwarded to income tax authorities.
The directions stem from a Karnataka government plea over black money seizures in Bellary during the 2014 Lok Sabha elections.
- Who
- The Supreme Court of India, led by Justices Sanjay Karol and N.K. Singh, acting on a plea from the Karnataka government.
- What
- Issued directions to curb black money in elections, including faster investigations and reporting of cash seizures.
- Where
- New Delhi, India; the case relates to black money seizures in Bellary district, Karnataka.
- When
- Monday (the ruling); compliance affidavits due by November 18.
- Why
- To protect democracy and the rule of law from the influence of ill-gotten money in the electoral process.
Key facts
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Bench
- Justices Sanjay Karol and N.K. Singh
- Seizure reporting deadline
- Within 24 hours to District Magistrate/ADM/court
- Investigation timeline
- One year, with delays reported to the Election Commission
- Cash threshold for tax authorities
- Rs 10 lakh
- Compliance affidavit deadline
- November 18
- Case origin
- Karnataka government plea on 2014 Lok Sabha elections
- Seizure location
- Bellary district, Karnataka
Quotes
Justice Sanjay Karol
Justice Sanjay Karol, author of the verdict
“Black money in the electoral process is one such aspect that compromises democracy, rule of law and the electoral process itself”
deccanchronicle.com
“If this timeline is exceeded, reasons shall be recorded and communicated to the Election Commission of India”
deccanchronicle.com
Sources
Related news
Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to Political Cash Donations
Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to Anonymous Political Cash Donations
Supreme Court Refuses to Release TMC's Frozen Rs 440-Crore Funds
Court Allows Public Suggestions for Ram Mandir Donation SIT Probe
SC Dismisses Varma Cash Probe Plea as 'Cheap Publicity' Move
High Court denies TMC access to four frozen accounts
HHRC Seeks Answers Over 20-Year Water Shortage in Faridabad
Shinde Sena Challenges Shiv Sena’s 2018 Power Shift
Supreme Court Questions BCI Chairman’s Proposed Five-Year Tenure
BJP MPs Seek National Commission for General Category Interests
PUCL Urges CJI Action Over Rajasthan High Court Allegations
