13 hrs ago
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR, Warns Against Criminal Settlements
The Bombay High Court ended a criminal case against Niraj Rajaram More.
More had been accused along with six other people in a violent incident.
The complainant later said he had named More by mistake.
He said it was difficult to identify people during the nighttime confusion.
The complainant also said More was not involved and that he did not want to continue the case against him.
The court agreed to cancel the case against More.
However, it ordered the complainant to pay ₹20,000 to a trust.
The court said criminal cases should not be started or withdrawn just to help people settle private disagreements.
The Bombay High Court quashed an FIR and related proceedings against Pune resident Niraj Rajaram More.
More was one of seven people accused in a September 2023 Chikhali police station case.
The complainant said he had mistakenly identified More during a confusing nighttime incident.
Justice Milind Jadhav ordered the complainant to pay ₹20,000 to the A.K. Munshi Yojana trust.
The court warned that criminal cases must not be used as bargaining chips in private disputes.
- Who
- The Bombay High Court, Justice Milind Jadhav, complainant, and accused Niraj Rajaram More.
- What
- The court quashed the FIR and subsequent proceedings against More and warned against using criminal cases for private settlements.
- Where
- The case involved Chikhali police station in Pimpri-Chinchwad, near Pune, Maharashtra.
- When
- The FIR was registered in September 2023; the court issued its ruling during the subsequent proceedings.
- Why
- The complainant said More had been named by mistake because of confusion during the incident, while the court addressed concerns about misuse of criminal proceedings.
Key facts
- Accused receiving relief
- Niraj Rajaram More
- Number of accused in FIR
- Seven
- Police station
- Chikhali police station
- FIR date
- September 2023
- Allegations
- Rioting, assault, criminal intimidation, attempt to murder, and offences under the Arms Act
- Court-ordered cost
- ₹20,000 payable to the A.K. Munshi Yojana trust
- Presiding judge
- Justice Milind Jadhav
Quotes
Bombay High Court
The court issuing the warning while hearing the petition to quash the FIR against Niraj Rajaram More.
“Criminal law cannot be used as a bargaining chip or a tool for private settlements.”
freepressjournal.in
Sources
Related news
Delhi High Court Quashes Friends’ FIR, Orders Manipur Hospital Service
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Failed Relationship Case
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR, Citing Young Offender’s Reform
Calcutta High Court Quashes Cruelty Case After Rs 13-Lakh Settlement
Kerala High Court Quashes Case Over Marriage Promise Claim
Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR Over Failed Marriage Promise
Fancy Plates Persist in Pune Despite High-Security Mandate
Pimpri-Chinchwad RTO Issues 395 Challans in Vehicle Crackdown
Maharashtra Plans End-User Royalty Accountability To Curb Illegal Mining
18 Illegal Kiosks Removed in Bhosari Over Public Drinking Complaints
