12 hrs ago

IFF Condemns Apple's Removal of BitChat in India

IFF Condemns Apple's Removal of BitChat in India
‘Unconstitutional’: Advocacy group condemns BitChat's removal from India App Store on govt order, lists four demands · livemint.com

Apple removed BitChat from its India App Store after receiving a government demand.

Apple’s notice said the app included content that was illegal, but it did not explain what that content was.

BitChat lets nearby phones send messages to one another using Bluetooth, even without internet access.

The Internet Freedom Foundation says the government should not block the whole app without explaining its reasons.

It also says the app’s ability to work during internet shutdowns is not, by itself, a valid reason to block it.

IFF wants the government to publish the order and give the developers a chance to respond.

It also wants Apple to tell users more about the demand.

Apple says the app is still available in other places, but Indian users cannot download it from the India store or test it through TestFlight.

Key facts

App
BitChat, an offline messaging application associated with Jack Dorsey.
Removal authority cited
Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000.
Government ministry
Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY).
Apple's stated reason
The app allegedly included content illegal in India; the notice did not specify the content.
App availability in India
Removed from the India App Store; its TestFlight builds are no longer available for testing in India.
IFF's position
The removal is unconstitutional and the blocking order should be published and withdrawn.
IFF's next step
The organisation said it would seek a copy of the order through Right to Information Act applications.

Quotes

Internet Freedom Foundation

An advocacy organisation that criticised the app’s removal.

“Section 69A permits the blocking of unlawful information, not of a messenger for working during internet shutdowns.”
livemint.com
“The removal of BitChat from the India App Store is unconstitutional.”
livemint.com

Sources

Related news