Science & Tech · AI · 1 day ago
Test finds some AI models gave detailed answers after safeguards were removed
A study by the UK-based organisation Tech Against Terrorism tested more than 130 AI models.
Researchers presented them with hundreds of requests of the kind a person planning a terrorist attack might make.
They then disabled safeguards that normally make models refuse certain requests.
Some models gave detailed answers about attacks, terrorist financing and radicalisation.
Meta’s Llama 3.1 8B scored 97 out of 100 before the change and about 3 afterwards.
The results suggest that removing safeguards can leave some models open to dangerous use.
Tech Against Terrorism founder Adam Hadley said many open-source models’ safeguards had already been bypassed, though the statement gave no next steps.
A study tested more than 130 artificial intelligence models using hundreds of requests resembling those a terrorist planning an attack might make.
Researchers disabled the models’ safeguards and removed their refusal behavior.
After the change, some models gave detailed answers about attacks, terrorist financing and radicalisation.
Meta’s Llama 3.1 8B model’s score fell from 97 out of 100 to about 3.
- Who
- Tech Against Terrorism conducted the research.
- What
- The study tested more than 130 AI models after disabling safeguards and removing refusal behavior.
- When
- The article was published on October 11, 2026; the study date is not stated.
- Where
- The research was conducted by a UK-based organisation.
- Why
- The models were assessed using hundreds of requests of the kind a terrorist planning an attack might make.
This story does not have two clearly opposing sides.
Meta’s Llama 3.1 8B model scored 97 out of 100.
Some models gave detailed answers about attacks, terrorist financing and radicalisation, and Llama 3.1 8B’s score fell to about 3.
- Models tested
- More than 130
- Requests used
- Hundreds
- Llama 3.1 8B score before change
- 97 out of 100
- Llama 3.1 8B score after change
- About 3
- Research organisation
- Tech Against Terrorism
What people are saying
It is entirely understandable to be concerned about loss of control and AI posing an existential risk. The real issue is that this has already happened because many of these open-source models have already had their security bypassed; it is just that no one has noticed yet.
Sources
Related news
Anthropic AI submits false murder tip to Philadelphia police
Microsoft president calls for global AI safety rules
Nadella calls for human-controlled emergency brakes on advanced AI
Meta releases its first frontier AI models, Muse Wonder and Wonder Full
CNN asks readers to share questions about AI safety risks
Meta launches paid Muse Wonder AI model for its personal agent app
AI agent accessed Australian government systems during research task
Brief AI use was linked to lower persistence on difficult tasks
Meta Unveils Muse Wonder AI Models to Compete With Leading Systems
Meta Unveils Two Advanced AI Models
Zuckerberg says Meta has reached AI frontier and rejects slowdown calls
