Politics · South Korea · 1 hr ago
South Korean parties clash over judges at Constitutional Court audit
South Korean lawmakers from opposing parties clashed during a parliamentary audit of the Constitutional Court on October 13.
Governing-party lawmakers criticized Supreme Court Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae over his refusal to nominate a candidate again after a request from the presidential office.
They also raised claims about his role in a court ruling involving President Lee Jae-myung and payments to judges.
Opposition lawmakers questioned Constitutional Court Chief Justice Kim Sang-hwan about his spouse joining an overseas work trip and his use of official expenses.
Kim was appointed by Lee last year.
The lawmakers made competing arguments about who has authority over the nomination process, and the opposition asked for expense records covering 2022 through 2026.
The audit also became heated after an opposition lawmaker made personal remarks about Lee, and the committee chair urged lawmakers to focus on their questions.
South Korea’s ruling Democratic Party and opposition People Power Party traded accusations during a parliamentary audit of the Constitutional Court on October 13.
Democratic Party lawmakers criticized Supreme Court Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae over a dispute about the president’s role in appointing Supreme Court justices.
People Power Party lawmakers questioned Constitutional Court President Kim Sang-hwan about his business expenses and his spouse’s presence on an overseas trip.
The audit also became heated after People Power Party lawmaker Joo Jin-woo made remarks about President Lee Jae-myung.
- Who
- Democratic Party and People Power Party lawmakers questioned Constitutional Court President Kim Sang-hwan and debated issues involving Supreme Court Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae.
- What
- The parties clashed during a parliamentary audit of the Constitutional Court.
- When
- October 13, 2026.
- Where
- The National Assembly in Seoul, South Korea.
- Why
- The Democratic Party challenged Cho over a dispute about Supreme Court appointments, while the People Power Party questioned Kim’s expenses and his spouse’s overseas travel.
Democratic Party
People Power Party
Supreme Court appointments
Democratic Party
The president’s appointment authority is the final decision, and Cho’s position was criticized as denying the Constitution.
People Power Party
Not stated.
Cho Hee-dae
Democratic Party
Lawmakers accused Cho of intervening in the presidential election and said any impeachment case should be tried thoroughly.
People Power Party
Not stated.
Kim Sang-hwan
Democratic Party
Not stated.
People Power Party
Lawmakers challenged Kim over his spouse’s attendance on an overseas trip and his use of business expenses.
The National Assembly’s Legislation and Judiciary Committee held an audit of the Constitutional Court.
Democratic Party lawmakers criticized Cho Hee-dae, while People Power Party lawmakers questioned Kim Sang-hwan.
A heated exchange broke out after People Power Party lawmaker Joo Jin-woo made personal remarks about President Lee Jae-myung.
- Audit date
- October 13, 2026
- Audit venue
- National Assembly, Seoul
- Constitutional Court president
- Kim Sang-hwan
- Supreme Court chief justice
- Cho Hee-dae
- Kim’s 2025 business expenses
- 945 million won
What people are saying
If it proceeds to impeachment, it must be tried thoroughly.
You said in the overseas business trip plan report that the Spanish Constitutional Court had invited your spouse, but that was a lie. There was no invitation.
The Constitutional Court president's business expenses in 2025 were 945 million won, and it seems about 50 million won was spent in cash.
I hope we can conduct the audit focusing on questions, without personal attacks on either side.











