Politics · South Korea · 1 day ago
South Korea's top court upholds teacher's fine for emotional abuse
South Korea's Supreme Court has upheld a 5 million won fine for an elementary school teacher in Busan.
The teacher was convicted of repeatedly making belittling comments to a 9-year-old pupil in front of classmates.
The pupil's parent had placed a recorder in the child's bag to capture classroom conversations.
The recording was excluded because South Korean law bars recording private conversations between other people.
The teacher argued that the pupil's and parent's testimony should also be excluded because it was connected to the recording.
The courts found the pupil's testimony was consistent and could stand as evidence independently of the recording.
The Supreme Court confirmed the fine and an order for the teacher to complete 40 hours of a child-abuse treatment program.
South Korea’s Supreme Court upheld a 5 million won fine for a teacher convicted of emotionally abusing a nine-year-old student.
The teacher repeatedly made remarks to the student in front of classmates, including that the student caused her stress.
The court said statements from the child and others could be used as evidence even though a parent had illegally recorded classroom conversations.
The recording itself was excluded from evidence.
The Supreme Court rejected the teacher’s appeal, finding no legal error in the lower court’s ruling.
- Who
- A primary-school teacher in Busan, identified as A in the article, and a nine-year-old student.
- What
- The Supreme Court upheld the teacher’s 5 million won fine for emotional abuse.
- When
- The Supreme Court ruling was reported on October 11, 2026; the article says it was issued recently.
- Where
- Busan, South Korea.
- Why
- The teacher was convicted over repeated remarks to the student. The court ruled that independent statements could be admitted even though a parent’s classroom recording was excluded.
Teacher A
Supreme Court
Evidence
Teacher A
A argued that witness statements and court testimony were inadmissible because they were based on an illegally obtained recording.
Supreme Court
The court found that the child’s and guardian’s statements could be admitted independently of the recording.
Sentence
Teacher A
A argued that the original sentence was too severe.
Supreme Court
The appeal court reduced the sentence to a fine, and the Supreme Court upheld that ruling.
the lower court did not misunderstand the legal principles concerning the exclusion of illegally collected evidence and the admissibility of secondary evidence
Even if the victim’s mother illegally recorded classroom conversations to confirm the facts of the alleged abuse, that alone does not mean the statements of the victim or guardian can be excluded as evidence.
The lower court used statements and court testimony based on the recording as evidence of guilt despite rejecting the recording’s admissibility as evidence.
The court convicted the teacher, imposed a suspended prison sentence and ordered community service and a five-year restriction on working at child-related institutions.
The appeal court reduced the punishment to a 5 million won fine and ordered 40 hours of child-abuse treatment.
The Supreme Court rejected the teacher’s appeal and upheld the ruling.
Yonhap reported the Supreme Court decision.
- Fine
- 5 million won
- Student
- Nine years old
- Location
- Busan, South Korea
- Recording
- A parent placed a recorder in the child’s bag; the recording was excluded as evidence
- Treatment order
- 40 hours of child-abuse treatment
- Supreme Court
- Rejected the teacher’s appeal











