World · South & Central Asia · 1 hr ago
Supreme Court says banks may have to compensate victims if negligence enables cyber fraud
India’s Supreme Court is considering bank compensation for people who lose money to cyber fraud when a bank’s negligence helped the scam happen.
The case concerns digital-arrest scams, in which fraudsters pressure people into believing they are being arrested over a phone or video call.
The three-judge bench said banks should watch for unusual transactions and consider checking them before money is sent.
It said victims should be repaid at least for their losses if an investigation finds a bank failed to take necessary care.
The court noted that such crimes caused about 800 crore rupees in losses this year, despite a reported fall in registered digital-arrest cases.
It asked India’s central bank, the RBI, to provide a list of authorised financial institutions and examine whether proposed KYC rules provide for compensation.
The court may issue directions applying to all financial institutions, and will consider the RBI’s proposed rules at a later hearing.
The Supreme Court said banks may have to compensate cyber-fraud victims if an investigation finds that bank negligence enabled the fraud.
The court urged banks to flag and check unusual transactions before money is transferred.
It asked the Reserve Bank of India to consider compensation rules and provide a list of authorised financial institutions.
The court said India had lost about ₹800 crore to digital-arrest fraud this year, despite a reported fall in cases compared with last year.
- Who
- The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, and the Reserve Bank of India. Banks and other financial institutions are also involved.
- What
- The court said banks may have to compensate victims if their negligence enables cyber fraud.
- When
- The hearing was reported on 29 October 2026.
- Where
- New Delhi, India.
- Why
- The court is concerned about digital-arrest scams and wants financial institutions to detect suspicious transactions and protect customers.
Supreme Court
Central government
Responsibility for rules
Supreme Court
The court urged RBI to consider rules requiring compensation when financial institutions fail to take necessary care.
Central government
The attorney general said that setting banks’ responsibilities and making rules falls within RBI’s remit.
The court said the central government should consider making digital arrest a separate crime with stricter punishment.
The court called digital-arrest fraud digital robbery and said offenders should be dealt with firmly.
The court discussed possible bank compensation for fraud enabled by negligence and asked RBI for a list of authorised financial institutions.
- 2026 losses
- About ₹800 crore from digital-arrest fraud, according to the Supreme Court
- 2026 cases
- More than 22,000 digital-arrest cases, according to Dainik Bhaskar
- 2025 cases
- 58,239 digital-arrest cases, according to Dainik Bhaskar
- 2025 losses
- About ₹1,211 crore, according to Dainik Bhaskar
- Recent reported fraud
- A woman lost ₹2.5 crore in a digital-arrest scam
- RBI proposal
- KYC Amendment Directions, 2026
4 sources
Supreme Court calls for financial institutions to compensate digital arrest victims
'डिजिटल फ्रॉड के शिकार लोगों को बैंक दे मुआवजा', जवाबदेही पर SC की टिप्पणी
ठगी होने पर बैंक को लौटाना पड़ेगा पैसा? सुप्रीम कोर्ट की डिजिटल अरेस्ट स्कैम पर सख्त टिप्पणी
CJI बोले- बैंक डिजिटल अरेस्ट की जिम्मेदारी क्यों नहीं लेते: अगर उनकी लापरवाही तो हर्जाना दें; 2026 में ₹800...
What people are saying
If cyber fraud occurs because of a bank's negligence, the bank should compensate the victim and face action once responsibility is established. This is a proposal, not a final order.
How can someone be arrested over a mobile phone?