Archive · 8 Oct 2026
COP31 Must Turn Climate Promises Into Projects for People
The article says countries have promised money to help with climate change, but the money available is still not enough.
India needs a lot of funding each year, and borrowing costs it more than it costs richer countries.
Many investments go to projects that can earn money, while local projects that protect people from heat and climate damage often get less support.
The article says climate funding should include grants and show how it makes communities safer.
It also says India should use more electricity, while recognising that coal will remain part of its power system for some time.
Support is needed for grids, storage and other ways to make electricity supply flexible.
Finally, developing countries need fair treatment and predictable help as they reduce emissions from industries such as steel and cement.
OECD data show developed countries provided and mobilised about $137 billion in climate finance in 2024, while grants remained below $30 billion.
India’s climate finance need is estimated at about $170 billion annually through 2030, and its borrowers pay 1–3 percentage points more than comparable borrowers in developed countries.
The article argues that investment-heavy finance often overlooks community-focused adaptation, including watershed restoration, agroforestry, heat-resilient housing and health systems.
It urges India to seek grants and measurable resilience outcomes through the Global Goal on Adaptation, while supporting electrification without requiring an immediate clean-only power rule.
The article says developing-country exporters need predictable support and consideration of their circumstances as they decarbonise and face trade-related carbon charges.
- Who
- India, developed countries, and developing-country exporters.
- What
- An argument for COP31 to make climate commitments deliver accessible finance, community resilience and support for electrification and industrial decarbonisation.
- When
- COP31; the article also cites climate-finance figures for 2024 and needs through 2030.
- Where
- India and international climate negotiations.
- Why
- The article says existing climate finance is insufficient, costly for Indian borrowers, and often misses community adaptation needs.
Concerns raised
Article's counterpoint
Electrification and power sources
Concerns raised
The 35-by-35 pledge could count electricity from new gas and coal generation as progress because it does not require clean power.
Article's counterpoint
The article says India should support electrification rather than a clean-only rule, recognising national circumstances and India's position to phase down, not phase out, unabated coal.
Climate finance priorities
Concerns raised
Commercially attractive projects can dominate finance, leaving community-focused adaptation with diffuse benefits underfunded.
Article's counterpoint
The article argues the Global Goal on Adaptation offers India an opportunity to push for grants and clear resilience outcomes for affected communities.
Trade and industrial decarbonisation
Concerns raised
Border carbon charges can disregard developing countries' circumstances as their exporters decarbonise steel and cement.
Article's counterpoint
The article argues countries on a development trajectory need carbon space and predictable support, rather than a timetable that ignores capacity.
- Developed-country climate finance
- About USD 137 billion provided and mobilised in 2024, according to OECD data cited in the article.
- Grant finance
- Grants remained below USD 30 billion.
- India's estimated climate finance need
- About USD 170 billion per year through 2030.
- Borrowing-cost difference
- Indian borrowers routinely pay 1–3 percentage points more than borrowers in developed countries for comparable assets.
- Agenda's 35-by-35 pledge
- Calls for electricity to reach 35 percent of final energy use by 2035; the article notes it does not require that electricity to come from clean sources.
- Resilient Cities goal
- Aims for a 25 percent reduction in buildings' energy intensity.
- Adaptation priority
- The article calls for grants for communities facing climate losses and clear resilience outcomes alongside mitigation goals.