Archive · 24 Sep 2025
Advocate Calls for Review of Constitution's Basic Structure Doctrine
Imagine the Constitution as a building.
The 'basic structure doctrine' says that while you can make changes (renovations), you can't change the building's core foundations.
A senior lawyer, Rakesh Dwivedi, is questioning this rule.
He thinks the rule is unclear and constantly changes.
He said the people of India have the right to amend the constitution.
The doctrine came about from a court case in 1973.
Dwivedi argues that because the list of core foundations isn't defined, it's hard to know what changes are allowed.
He believes the power to amend the constitution should be with the citizens.
Senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi called for a review of the Constitution's basic structure doctrine.
The doctrine originated from the 1973 Kesavananda Bharati verdict.
Dwivedi described the doctrine as vague, ambiguous, and ever-growing.
The event discussing the doctrine was organized by Adhivakta Parishad Supreme Court Unit.
Dwivedi believes the power to amend the Constitution should rest with the citizens.
- Who
- Senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi
- What
- Called for a review of the basic structure doctrine of the Constitution.
- When
- September 23, 2024 (event). Reported on September 24, 2024.
- Where
- Delhi
- Why
- Dwivedi considers the doctrine vague, ambiguous, and ever-growing.
Pro-Doctrine
Anti-Doctrine
Doctrine's Nature
Pro-Doctrine
Protects fundamental aspects of the Constitution.
Anti-Doctrine
It's vague, ambiguous, and ever-growing.
Amendment Power
Pro-Doctrine
Parliament can amend the Constitution.
Anti-Doctrine
Power to amend constitution has to be with citizens only
- Key Figure
- Senior Advocate Rakesh Dwivedi
- Event
- Discussion on Basic Structure of the Constitution
- Location
- Pradhan Mantri Sangrahalaya, Delhi
- Doctrine Origin
- Kesavananda Bharati verdict (1973)
- Dwivedi's Stance
- Doctrine is vague and needs review