Archive · 24 Jul 2025
Owaisi Accuses Centre of Inconsistent Appeals in Terror Cases
Asaduddin Owaisi, a politician, is accusing the government of not being fair when dealing with people accused of terrorism.
He says the government acts differently depending on who is accused.
He points out that the government did not appeal in some cases where people were found not guilty, but did appeal in others.
He thinks this is wrong because it makes it seem like the government is biased.
He wants the government to treat everyone the same way, regardless of their background, to make sure justice is served and people can trust the legal system.
AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi criticizes the government's handling of terror cases.
Owaisi questions the government's appeal strategy, alleging inconsistency.
He cites the Malegaon blast case and potential government response to acquittal.
Owaisi highlights disparities, mentioning the Mecca Masjid and Ajmer blast cases.
He argues for a uniform policy, warning against selective action based on accused identity.
- Who
- Asaduddin Owaisi, AIMIM chief and Hyderabad MP; the Central government.
- What
- Asaduddin Owaisi questions the government's consistency in appealing terror case verdicts.
- When
- Not explicitly mentioned.
- Where
- India
- Why
- Owaisi believes selective action undermines national security and public trust.
Owaisi's Stance
Government Stance (Not Explicitly Stated)
Consistent Policy
Owaisi's Stance
The government's selective appeals based on accused background risks undermining the fight against terrorism.
Government Stance (Not Explicitly Stated)
The government has not provided an opposing viewpoint in the articles provided.
- Politician
- Asaduddin Owaisi
- Position
- AIMIM chief, Hyderabad MP
- Issue
- Government's handling of terror cases
- Allegation
- Inconsistent appeal strategy
- Case Mentioned
- Malegaon, Mecca Masjid, Ajmer, Mumbai train blasts