Archive · 19 Jul 2026
NEET-UG 2026 Re-Exam Errors Alleged by Beed Students
Some students from Beed district in Maharashtra are upset because their NEET-UG 2026 re-exam scores don't match what they expected.
They used the official answer key to calculate their scores, but the official results show much lower marks.
For example, one student expected 522 marks but got only 95, and another expected 702 but got 87.
The parents are very worried and plan to go to court if the mistakes aren't fixed.
The re-exam was held on June 21 after the original exam in May was cancelled due to allegations of a paper leak.
The parents want the National Testing Agency (NTA) to investigate and correct the scores.
Students from Beed district allege discrepancies between their expected NEET-UG 2026 re-exam scores and the official results.
Parents claim the errors have jeopardized their children's futures and are preparing to approach the court.
The re-exam was conducted on June 21 after the original May 3 exam was cancelled due to paper leak allegations.
Examples include Soham Gavte expecting 522 marks but receiving 95, and Dnyaneshwari Pawar expecting 702 but receiving 87.
Parents demand an immediate investigation by the NTA and the issuance of revised scorecards where errors are found.
- Who
- Students from Beed district, Maharashtra, and their parents
- What
- Alleged discrepancies between expected and declared NEET-UG 2026 re-exam scores
- When
- After the declaration of results for the re-exam conducted on June 21
- Where
- Beed district, Maharashtra, India
- Why
- Parents claim mathematical gaps in scores have jeopardized their children's futures
- Exam
- NEET-UG 2026 re-exam
- Re-Exam Date
- June 21
- Original Exam Date
- May 3 (cancelled due to paper leak allegations)
- Affected Students
- Soham Gavte, Dnyaneshwari Pawar
- Discrepancy Examples
- Soham Gavte: Expected 522, got 95; Dnyaneshwari Pawar: Expected 702, got 87
- Parents' Action
- Seeking court intervention and NTA investigation
- NTA's Role
- Declared results; no official response to discrepancies yet