Archive · 4 Sep 2026
Rajasthan Acting Chief Justice Denies Supreme Court Judge’s Allegations
A Supreme Court judge made serious complaints about the acting chief justice of the Rajasthan High Court.
He said the acting chief justice changed the order of cases to help rich people.
He also said the judge gave administrative jobs to people close to him.
The Supreme Court judge said some other judges had shared concerns about this conduct.
The acting chief justice denied the accusations and called them baseless.
He said he had sent evidence and his explanation to the Chief Justice of India.
He asked people to wait before deciding who was right.
A new chief justice has been recommended for the Rajasthan High Court, and Sharma is due to retire soon.
Rajasthan High Court Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma called allegations against him baseless and motivated by resentment.
Supreme Court Justice Sandeep Mehta accused Sharma of manipulating case listings and favoring wealthy litigants.
Mehta also alleged Sharma used his position to appoint associates to administrative posts and threatened judges with transfers.
Sharma said he had provided evidence rebutting the allegations to Chief Justice of India Surya Kant.
The Supreme Court collegium has recommended Justice Sanjay K Agrawal as Rajasthan High Court chief justice; Sharma retires on September 26.
- Who
- Rajasthan High Court Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma and Supreme Court Justice Sandeep Mehta are the central figures; Chief Justice of India Surya Kant is reviewing the matter.
- What
- Mehta accused Sharma of misusing administrative powers, manipulating case listings, favoring wealthy litigants, making questionable appointments, and threatening judges; Sharma denied the allegations.
- When
- The allegations were made in letters last month; the collegium recommendation was made on August 31, and Sharma is due to retire on September 26.
- Where
- The dispute concerns the Rajasthan High Court and was raised before the Chief Justice of India.
- Why
- Mehta sought Sharma’s immediate replacement over the alleged conduct, while Sharma said the accusations were baseless and motivated by resentment.
Justice Sandeep Mehta’s allegations
Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma’s response
Case listings and litigants
Justice Sandeep Mehta’s allegations
Mehta alleged that Sharma manipulated the listing of cases to favor wealthy litigants.
Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma’s response
Sharma denied the allegations and said he had refuted them with evidence.
Administrative appointments
Justice Sandeep Mehta’s allegations
Mehta alleged that Sharma used his position to appoint people close to him to administrative posts.
Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma’s response
Sharma characterized the broader allegations as baseless and asked people to await the Chief Justice of India’s decision.
Treatment of fellow judges
Justice Sandeep Mehta’s allegations
Mehta alleged that Sharma frequently threatened judges with retributive action, including transfers, while claiming closeness to the Chief Justice of India.
Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma’s response
Sharma said the claims were made out of resentment and stated that he would present his side publicly after receiving approval from the Chief Justice of India.
- Acting chief justice
- Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
- Accusing judge
- Supreme Court Justice Sandeep Mehta
- Reviewing authority
- Chief Justice of India Surya Kant
- Allegations
- Manipulating case listings, favoring rich litigants, making allegedly improper administrative appointments, and threatening judges with transfers
- Recommended successor
- Justice Sanjay K Agrawal
- Retirement date
- September 26
- Sharma’s response
- He called the allegations baseless, said they arose from resentment, and stated that he had submitted evidence rebutting them