8 months ago

IPO Surges Seen as Investment Banker Failure

IPO Surges Seen as Investment Banker Failure
Devina Mehra explains why investment bankers are seen as failures if an IPO surges after listing · livemint.com

Devina Mehra, who started a company called First Global, said something interesting about IPOs.

When a new stock starts trading much higher than its IPO price, people might think the company and its bankers did a great job.

But Mehra says this is actually a sign that the bankers didn't get the best price for the company.

She explained that bankers are paid based on how many deals they do and how much money they raise, not on how the stock does after the IPO.

So, their goal is to set the highest possible price for the shares, not to make sure the stock does well later.

This means that if a stock goes up a lot after the IPO, it shows the bankers could have set a higher price initially.

Mehra's comments come as many recent IPOs in India have had smaller gains when they first started trading, with an average gain of 5%.

After listing, these stocks have given an average return of 7%.

Key facts

Devina Mehra
Founder of First Global
Listing Gain
Average 5% in ongoing quarter
Post-Listing Returns
Average 7%
Investment Banker Evaluation
Based on deals and fees, not post-IPO performance
IPO Price Objective
Maximize issue price for the company

Quotes

Devina Mehra

Founder of First Global, a market veteran

“Meaning the higher the price they sell the shares to you at, the better they are considered in their job. No investment banker is ever evaluated on how the stock does after the IPO”
livemint.com
“the investment banker is considered to have FAILED in their duty to get the best price for the issuer”
livemint.com

Sources

Related news