Archive · 31 Aug 2026
Why Private Bank CEOs Are Walking Away From Reappointments
Several private bank bosses in India are deciding not to stay for another full term.
Sashidhar Jagdishan will leave HDFC Bank after his current term ends.
Leaders at South Indian Bank and Kotak Mahindra Bank have also chosen not to seek reappointment.
ICICI Bank’s Sandeep Bakhshi will stay for two years instead of the usual three.
Some experts think bank boards and managers may disagree about priorities and long-term plans.
Another expert says each case may have different causes, including regulations and uncertainty.
Experts are concerned that delays in choosing new leaders could make banks’ plans slower.
They also say banks need strong succession planning so capable leaders are ready to take over.
HDFC Bank CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan will not seek a third term after October 26, 2026.
South Indian Bank’s P R Seshadri and Kotak Mahindra Bank’s Ashok Vaswani also declined reappointment.
ICICI Bank CEO Sandeep Bakhshi received approval for a shorter two-year reappointment.
Experts cite possible board-management differences, regulatory constraints and prolonged appointment uncertainty.
Analysts warn that weak succession planning could disrupt transformation and reduce shareholder value.
- Who
- Chief executives of several Indian private-sector banks, including Sashidhar Jagdishan, P R Seshadri, Ashok Vaswani and Sandeep Bakhshi.
- What
- Some CEOs are not seeking reappointment, while Sandeep Bakhshi has accepted a shorter two-year reappointment.
- When
- The developments discussed include decisions made in 2026; Jagdishan’s term ends October 26, 2026, and Vaswani’s ends December 31, 2026.
- Where
- Private-sector banks in India.
- Why
- Experts cite possible differences over strategy and priorities, regulatory constraints, insufficient support for transformation and prolonged appointment uncertainty.
Misalignment and Transformation Concerns
Multiple Causes and Constructive Governance
Reasons for CEO departures
Misalignment and Transformation Concerns
Some experts argue that differences between boards and CEOs over priorities, strategy and support for long-term transformation are prompting capable leaders to leave.
Multiple Causes and Constructive Governance
Vivek Iyer said the cases may reflect different factors, including regulatory constraints, strategic disagreements or prolonged uncertainty, and not necessarily fundamental board-management misalignment.
Role of disagreement
Misalignment and Transformation Concerns
Persistent disagreement may indicate weaknesses in board competence, oversight and support for investments in technology and organisational change.
Multiple Causes and Constructive Governance
Iyer said constructive disagreement between a strong board and management is essential for sound governance, rather than inherently harmful.
Main risk to banks
Misalignment and Transformation Concerns
Weak succession planning and leadership exits could stall transformation, weaken lenders and damage shareholder and stakeholder value.
Multiple Causes and Constructive Governance
The broader immediate concern is uncertainty when appointments remain unresolved; predictable tenures and timely decisions could improve leadership continuity.
- HDFC Bank
- Sashidhar Jagdishan will not seek a third term; his tenure ends October 26, 2026.
- South Indian Bank
- P R Seshadri decided earlier in 2026 not to seek reappointment.
- Kotak Mahindra Bank
- Ashok Vaswani will not seek reappointment after his term ends December 31, 2026.
- ICICI Bank
- Sandeep Bakhshi received approval for a two-year reappointment instead of the usual three years.
- Potential causes
- Experts mention strategic disagreements, regulatory constraints, insufficient incentives or support, and prolonged uncertainty.
- Governance concern
- Unresolved CEO appointments may weaken leadership continuity and delay long-term transformation.
- Talent pipeline
- One expert said private-sector banks may lack enough seasoned CEO candidates and that filling the gap could take nearly seven years.