Archive · 4 Sep 2026
Delhi Court Convicts Man in 2022 Murder, Citing Child’s Testimony
A Delhi court found Bharat guilty of killing a woman named Aarti in 2022.
Aarti was stabbed several times at her home.
Her six-year-old son told the court that he saw the attack.
He said Bharat asked Aarti to come home before stabbing her when she refused.
The judge said the boy gave a clear and believable account.
The account matched the medical evidence.
CCTV footage reportedly showed Bharat leaving with a knife.
The court also heard that he had bought a knife three days before the killing.
The court will decide his punishment on September 11.
A Delhi court convicted Bharat for murdering 28-year-old Aarti at her home on April 21, 2022.
The court relied heavily on the “vivid and graphic” eyewitness testimony of Aarti’s six-year-old son.
The boy said Bharat told Aarti “ghar chal” before stabbing her multiple times when she refused.
CCTV allegedly showed Bharat fleeing with a knife, while investigators said he ordered it three days earlier.
Bharat was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and relevant Arms Act provisions; sentencing is scheduled for September 11.
- Who
- Bharat was convicted of murdering Aarti, with the prosecution relying partly on testimony from her six-year-old son.
- What
- The court convicted Bharat of murder and offences under relevant Arms Act provisions.
- When
- Aarti was killed on April 21, 2022; the judgment was dated August 19, and sentencing is scheduled for September 11.
- Where
- The killing occurred at Aarti’s house, and the case was decided by a Delhi court.
- Why
- The court found the child’s testimony credible and consistent with medical and electronic evidence, including CCTV footage.
Prosecution and Court Findings
Defence Position
Reliability of the child witness
Prosecution and Court Findings
The court found the child’s testimony untutored, vivid, specific and trustworthy, saying it could independently establish the prosecution’s case.
Defence Position
The defence challenged the prosecution’s case by arguing that Bharat was falsely implicated.
Relationship and motive
Prosecution and Court Findings
The prosecution and court said Bharat had developed a one-sided interest in Aarti, harassed her and her family, made objectionable advances, and chased her.
Defence Position
The defence argued that Bharat was in a live-in relationship with Aarti, an account the court rejected after reviewing the evidence.
Planning and physical evidence
Prosecution and Court Findings
The court cited CCTV footage showing Bharat fleeing with a knife and evidence that he ordered the alleged weapon three days before the killing.
Defence Position
The defence’s broader false-implication claim was rejected; the article does not provide a separate response to the CCTV or knife-purchase evidence.
- Victim
- Aarti, aged 28
- Accused
- Bharat
- Incident date
- April 21, 2022
- Cause of death
- A fatal stab wound to the heart, according to the post-mortem report
- Key witness
- Aarti’s six-year-old son
- Conviction
- Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and relevant Arms Act provisions
- Next hearing
- The order on the quantum of sentence is scheduled for September 11