59 mins ago
Telangana High Court Revives BCCI Ombudsman Proceedings in HCA Dispute
A court in Telangana is hearing a disagreement about how the Hyderabad Cricket Association is being managed.
An earlier court order had stopped a BCCI Ombudsman from examining the dispute.
A two-judge bench has now paused that earlier order.
This means the Ombudsman can continue looking into the case.
The proceedings will use Rules 40 and 41 of the BCCI Constitution.
The challenge was led by Supreme Court advocate Aditya Kumar Chowdhury.
Cricketers Gourav Sharma and Navarasan had earlier raised concerns about the association.
They said they wanted their concerns heard by the proper forum, not a personal victory.
They welcomed the court’s latest decision.
The Telangana High Court Division Bench stayed an earlier order halting BCCI Ombudsman proceedings.
The case concerns an ongoing governance dispute involving the Hyderabad Cricket Association.
Chief Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh and Justice Moinuddin heard the challenge to the August 14 interim order.
The ruling allows proceedings under Rules 40 and 41 of the BCCI Constitution to resume.
Cricketers Gourav Sharma and Navarasan said the decision strengthened their faith in the rule of law.
- Who
- The Telangana High Court Division Bench, the BCCI Ombudsman Justice (Retd.) Arun Mishra, Supreme Court advocate Aditya Kumar Chowdhury, and cricketers Gourav Sharma and Navarasan.
- What
- The Division Bench stayed an earlier interim order and revived proceedings before the BCCI Ombudsman in the Hyderabad Cricket Association dispute.
- Where
- The Telangana High Court in Hyderabad.
- When
- The latest Division Bench ruling followed a challenge to an interim order dated August 14; the year is not specified.
- Why
- The ruling restores the institutional process under Rules 40 and 41 of the BCCI Constitution for addressing the dispute.
Key facts
- Court
- Telangana High Court Division Bench
- Judges
- Chief Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh and Justice Moinuddin
- Dispute
- Governance of the Hyderabad Cricket Association
- Ombudsman
- Justice (Retd.) Arun Mishra
- Relevant rules
- Rules 40 and 41 of the BCCI Constitution
- Earlier order
- An August 14 interim order had halted the Ombudsman proceedings
- Challenge led by
- Supreme Court advocate Aditya Kumar Chowdhury
Quotes
Gourav Sharma
Cricketer whose grievance helped bring the HCA administrative dispute to attention
“We never sought a personal victory. We only wanted our concerns heard by a competent forum. Today’s development has deeply strengthened our faith in the rule of law.”
thehansindia.com
Sources
Related news
TCA Challenges HCA Automatic Selection Rules, Seeks Transparency
Supreme Court Appoints Former Orissa HC Chief Justice BCA Administrator
High Court Division Bench Stays Order Removing HYDRA Commissioner
High Court Puts HYDRAA Chief Ranganath’s Removal On Hold
Hyderabad Cricket League Batting Records Highlight Day Two
Four Centuries Highlight Hyderabad Cricket Association Opening Day
Rayudu Praises Alugunur Ground, Targets District Cricket Talent
Police Chief Anand Scores Unbeaten Century In Hyderabad League
