2 days ago

Ravi Nair Jailed After Warrant, Challenges Process in Gujarat

Ravi Nair Jailed After Warrant, Challenges Process in Gujarat
Gujarat, Adani firm get notice on journalist’s plea over non-bailable warrant · indianexpress.com

Ravi Nair was convicted in a case brought by Adani Enterprises over tweets and articles.

The court said the publications made serious accusations that could harm the company’s reputation.

He was sentenced to one year in prison and fined Rs 5,000.

Nair appealed the conviction and had been granted bail with a condition that he attend the hearings.

He missed a hearing on September 3, and the court issued a non-bailable warrant.

He was taken into custody and sent to jail on September 17.

Nair says the court should have warned him first or used a bailable warrant.

The Gujarat High Court has asked the government and Adani Enterprises to respond and will consider the matter on September 21.

Key facts

Petitioner
Ravi Nair, described as a journalist, columnist, and OCCRP partner journalist
Complainant
Adani Enterprises Limited, described as the flagship company of the Adani Group
Conviction
Criminal defamation conviction delivered by a magistrate’s court in Mansa in February 2026
Sentence
One year’s simple imprisonment and a Rs 5,000 fine
Publications at issue
Tweets and articles published between October 2020 and July 2021
Warrant and custody
Non-bailable warrant issued on September 3; Nair sent to judicial custody on September 17
High Court action
Notice issued to the Gujarat government and Adani Enterprises; further hearing scheduled for September 21

Quotes

The Judicial Magistrate First Class

Gandhinagar magistrate who convicted Ravi Nair in the Adani defamation case

“In these circumstances, the ingredients of the offence of defamation, as defined under Section 499 of the Indian Penal Code and punishable under Section 500 thereof, stand duly proved. The accused Mr Ravı Naır, is held to be guilty of the offence under Section 499, punishable under Section 500 of the IPC”
opindia.com
“However, surprisingly, the petitioner came to be sent to judicial custody in violation of law and procedure, although no application for cancellation of bail granted to him had been preferred by any party and no notice whatsoever on that aspect had been issued to him”
opindia.com

Sources

Related news