Archive · 10 Nov 2025
Evolution of Finance Commission Criteria for Fund Devolution
Imagine the government has a big pot of money it wants to share with all the different parts of the country, called states.
For a long time, the people who decide how to share this money, called Finance Commissions, looked at how many people lived in each state and how poor they were.
This meant that states with lots of people and lots of poor people got most of the money.
Later on, they started looking at other things too, like how good a state was at making money and how far its average income was from the richest state.
But even as they added new ways to measure things, the number of people in a state remained a very important factor in deciding how much money it got.
Finance Commissions (FCs) have historically used population and poverty as key factors in fund allocation.
The first and second FCs weighted population at 80% and tax collections at 20%.
The fourth FC introduced an economic backwardness index, keeping population at 75% and assigning 25% to backwardness.
The sixth FC redefined economic backwardness based on per capita income distance from the highest income state.
The weight of population in fund devolution has been a significant and consistent factor over time.
- Who
- Finance Commissions (FCs)
- What
- Determining the share of each state in central funds
- When
- Past Finance Commissions
- Where
- India
- Why
- To allocate central government funds to states based on various factors
- Early FCs (1st & 2nd)
- 80% Population, 20% Tax Collections
- 4th FC
- 75% Population, 25% Economic Backwardness Index
- 6th FC
- 75% Population, 25% Per Capita Income Distance