1 day ago

Supreme Court Allows Trump to Continue White House Ballroom Construction

Supreme Court Allows Trump to Continue White House Ballroom Construction
'I am pleased': Trump wins Supreme Court backing to continue $400 million White House ballroom work · wionews.com

The Supreme Court said workers can keep building a new ballroom at the White House for now.

The project is expected to cost $400 million and hold about 1,000 people.

A historic-preservation group says President Donald Trump cannot build it without permission from Congress.

Lower courts had ordered much of the work to stop.

The Supreme Court paused those orders while the legal case continues.

The justices did not decide whether the ballroom is ultimately legal.

The administration says the president can renovate the White House and that national security makes the project important.

The preservation group says the White House is building too quickly, possibly to finish before the courts can decide.

Court documents say the project is expected to be completed in August 2028.

Key facts

Estimated cost
$400 million
Planned size
90,000 square feet, designed to accommodate about 1,000 guests
Supreme Court vote
5-4; Chief Justice John Roberts joined the dissent
Legal effect
Aboveground construction may continue while the lawsuit returns to lower courts
Court's ruling
The justices did not decide the project's ultimate legality and said the government was likely to prevail on its argument that the National Trust lacked Article III standing
Construction status
The administration said the project was 65 percent complete, with a 250-person crew working 20 hours a day, seven days a week
Projected timeline
The framework was expected in November, much of the facade by April, and full completion in August 2028
Funding dispute
The project was announced as privately funded, but NBC News reported that Secret Service funds had been allocated for some security enhancements

Quotes

US Supreme Court

The nation’s highest federal court explaining the limited basis of its ruling

“We conclude only that, based on the submissions before us, the government is likely to prevail in showing that the Trust lacks Article III standing to challenge the project in federal court and that the remaining stay factors favor relief.”
thehansindia.com

Sources

Related news