Archive · 26 Jul 2026
Experts blame centralisation and privatisation for student unrest
Some experts think that making education more centralised and private has caused problems.
They say it has made education more expensive, led to cheating in exams, and made students unhappy.
They also think that schools should have more freedom to decide how they teach and who they admit.
The government has been promoting these changes through a policy called the National Education Policy (NEP).
Some people are protesting against these changes, and the education minister recently resigned.
The experts say that the protests are not just about one issue, but about many problems in the education system, including a lack of jobs for young people.
Education experts blame centralisation and privatisation for student unrest and protests.
The National Education Policy (NEP) promotes centralisation and privatisation in education.
Critics argue that centralised exams like NEET and CUET are plagued by corruption and unfair practices.
Proponents of centralisation believe it promotes efficiency and quality in education.
Experts advocate for diversity and autonomy in educational institutions.
- Who
- Education experts, including Rajesh Jha, Prof. Onkar Singh, Prof. Sunil Ray, and a faculty member of Jamia Millia Islamia
- What
- Student unrest and protests against centralisation and privatisation in education
- When
- After the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan on Saturday
- Where
- India
- Why
- Due to the perceived negative impacts of centralisation and privatisation on education, including increased costs, unfair examination practices, and lack of autonomy for educational institutions
Critics of Centralisation and Privatisation
Proponents of Centralisation and Privatisation
Impact on Education Costs
Critics of Centralisation and Privatisation
Critics argue that centralisation and privatisation have made education costly and inaccessible, with public schools closing and private schools opening to meet demand.
Proponents of Centralisation and Privatisation
Proponents believe that centralisation and privatisation promote efficiency and quality in education, making it more accessible and affordable in the long run.
Examination Practices
Critics of Centralisation and Privatisation
Critics claim that centralised exams like NEET and CUET are plagued by corruption and unfair practices, and that decentralisation is the solution.
Proponents of Centralisation and Privatisation
Proponents argue that centralised exams ensure standardisation and fairness, and that measures are in place to prevent and address malpractices.
Autonomy of Institutions
Critics of Centralisation and Privatisation
Critics advocate for diversity and autonomy in educational institutions, allowing them to decide their admission processes and academic affairs.
Proponents of Centralisation and Privatisation
Proponents believe that centralisation ensures consistency and quality across institutions, and that autonomy can lead to disparities and inefficiencies.
- Education Minister
- Dharmendra Pradhan
- National Education Policy
- NEP
- National Eligibility cum Entrance Test
- NEET
- Common University Entrance Test
- CUET
- Cockroach Janta Party
- CJP