Archive · 14 Sep 2026
BJD Threatens Odisha Economic Blockade Over MMDR Act
The Biju Janata Dal, or BJD, is unhappy with changes to the MMDR Act.
The party says the changes give the central government more control over Odisha’s minerals.
BJD leader Arun Kumar Sahoo warned that the party may organize economic and commercial blockades in Odisha.
The BJD also said Odisha has around Rs 1.20 lakh crore in pending dues from 2005 to 2026.
It worries that investors may come less often if Odisha loses control over its mineral resources.
Bharatiya Janata Party leader Amar Patnaik disagreed with the BJD.
He said the BJD was making misleading claims for political reasons.
Patnaik argued that one mineral tax system could help Odisha and India over time.
Biju Janata Dal MLA Arun Kumar Sahoo warned of economic and commercial blockades in Odisha if the MMDR Act is not withdrawn.
The BJD demanded that the Centre roll back amendments it says transfer mineral-resource powers from Odisha to the Centre.
The party claimed Odisha has about Rs 1.20 lakh crore in pending dues between 2005 and 2026.
Sahoo argued that weakening the state’s control over minerals could reduce investor interest in Odisha.
Bharatiya Janata Party leader Amar Patnaik accused the BJD of misleading people and said a single mineral tax regime could benefit Odisha long term.
- Who
- Biju Janata Dal MLA Arun Kumar Sahoo issued the warning, while Bharatiya Janata Party leader Amar Patnaik criticized it.
- What
- The BJD demanded withdrawal of the MMDR Act and threatened economic and commercial blockades in Odisha.
- When
- The warning was issued at a press conference; the BJD referred to pending dues accumulated between 2005 and 2026.
- Where
- Odisha, India.
- Why
- The BJD says the law weakens Odisha’s control over its mineral resources and could cause financial and investment losses; the BJP says the law could benefit Odisha through a single mineral tax regime.
BJD’s Position
BJP’s Position
Control over mineral resources
BJD’s Position
The BJD says the MMDR Act transfers powers over Odisha’s mineral resources to the Centre and weakens federalism.
BJP’s Position
The BJP says the BJD is creating a false narrative and that a unified mineral tax regime can produce broader benefits.
Effect on Odisha’s finances
BJD’s Position
The BJD claims Odisha could face financial losses and cites around Rs 1.20 lakh crore in pending dues between 2005 and 2026.
BJP’s Position
Amar Patnaik said any short-term financial loss should be weighed against possible long-term benefits for Odisha and India.
Effect on investment
BJD’s Position
The BJD questions whether investors will continue coming to Odisha if the state loses powers over its mineral resources.
BJP’s Position
The BJP argues that the MMDR Act would be beneficial for Odisha’s economy.
- Party issuing warning
- Biju Janata Dal (BJD)
- BJD spokesperson
- MLA Arun Kumar Sahoo
- Demand
- Withdrawal of the MMDR Act
- Threatened action
- Economic and commercial blockades in Odisha
- Claimed pending dues
- Around Rs 1.20 lakh crore between 2005 and 2026
- BJP response
- Amar Patnaik called the BJD’s allegations misleading and politically motivated
- BJP economic argument
- A single mineral tax regime could benefit Odisha in the long term