Archive · 27 Aug 2026
Sonu Nigam Denies Viral Statement Over Kriti Sanon Ad
Sonu Nigam said a viral statement about Kriti Sanon’s Rakhi advertisement was not written by him.
The statement had been wrongly connected to him.
It was actually attributed to someone named Singh.
The statement said the issue was not simply about what a woman wears.
Instead, it criticized what it called hypocrisy around Hindu festivals and traditions.
It also said people should dress respectfully at religious places and occasions.
Temples and gurdwaras were given as examples.
The statement asked people not to describe themselves as victims or challenge Hindus’ patience.
Sonu Nigam clarified that a viral statement about Kriti Sanon’s Rakhi advertisement was not his.
The statement was allegedly made by Singh but was falsely attributed to Nigam.
The controversy was described as involving perceived hypocrisy and attempts to influence people through Hindu festival traditions.
The statement said attire should follow a certain decorum at religious places and occasions, including temples and gurdwaras.
It urged people not to portray themselves as victims or test Hindus’ tolerance in a democratic country.
- Who
- Sonu Nigam clarified that a viral statement attributed to him was allegedly written by Singh and concerned Kriti Sanon’s Rakhi advertisement.
- What
- Nigam denied ownership of the viral statement, which criticized perceived hypocrisy and views about clothing at Hindu religious occasions.
- Where
- The statement referred to religious places including temples and gurdwaras, and to Hindus in a democratic country.
- Why
- Nigam clarified the attribution because the viral statement had been falsely linked to him.
Criticism of the Advertisement
Clarification and Rejection of Attribution
Meaning of the controversy
Criticism of the Advertisement
The disputed statement framed the issue as one of hypocrisy and attempts to influence people through Hindu festival traditions, rather than simply a question of women’s clothing.
Clarification and Rejection of Attribution
Sonu Nigam said the viral statement was not his and had been falsely attributed to him.
Religious attire and tolerance
Criticism of the Advertisement
The statement argued that attire should observe decorum at religious places and occasions, and urged people not to test Hindus’ restraint.
Clarification and Rejection of Attribution
Nigam’s clarification separated him from those comments; the article does not provide a further response from him on the underlying attire debate.
- Person clarifying
- Sonu Nigam
- Advertisement subject
- Kriti Sanon’s Rakhi advertisement
- Disputed attribution
- The viral statement was falsely attributed to Sonu Nigam and was said to be by Singh.
- Statement’s focus
- Perceived hypocrisy and attempts to influence people through Hindu festival traditions.
- Dress-related claim
- The statement said there is a certain decorum around attire at religious places and occasions.
- Examples cited
- Temples and gurdwaras.