Archive · 23 Sep 2026
MMDR Act 2026: Boon or Bane for Odisha Mining?
India changed its mining rules in 2026.
Opposition parties in Odisha say the new law could reduce the State’s income.
The law follows a 2015 system in which mines are allotted through competitive auctions.
Those auctions greatly increased Odisha’s mining revenue, according to the article.
Odisha also has a 20 per cent tax on the value of mineral-bearing land called the ORISED tax.
A court rejected that tax in 2005, but the Supreme Court later said States could tax mineral rights.
The new law allows State taxes but places limits on them.
Supporters say this prevents companies and consumers from facing too many overlapping charges.
Critics say the law should be withdrawn because it may harm Odisha’s finances.
The MMDR Amendment Act 2026 has triggered strong opposition protests in Odisha over alleged financial losses.
The 2015 auction system reportedly increased Odisha’s annual mining revenue from Rs 5,000 crore to Rs 50,000 crore.
Odisha’s 20 per cent ORISED tax was struck down by the Orissa High Court in 2005.
A 2024 Supreme Court ruling upheld States’ power to tax mineral rights and permitted retrospective arrears.
Supporters say the 2026 Act limits overlapping taxes, while opponents demand its withdrawal to protect State revenues.
- Who
- The Union government, Odisha’s government, Opposition parties in Odisha, mining companies, and affected citizens.
- What
- The MMDR Amendment Act 2026 was enacted amid protests over limits on State-level mining taxation.
- When
- The amendment was gazetted in 2026; relevant legal developments include the 2005 High Court ruling and July 2024 Supreme Court judgment.
- Where
- India, with the main political dispute in Odisha.
- Why
- The Union government introduced the amendment to limit overlapping mining taxes and reduce instability and uncertainty after auction premiums rose substantially.
Opposition and State-Revenue Concerns
Union Government and Mining-Efficiency Arguments
Financial impact on Odisha
Opposition and State-Revenue Concerns
Opposition parties allege that the 2026 Act will cause major financial losses to Odisha and demand its immediate withdrawal.
Union Government and Mining-Efficiency Arguments
Supporters argue that controlling additional taxation protects the competitiveness of mining and preserves future auction-premium revenue.
ORISED tax
Opposition and State-Revenue Concerns
The tax could provide Odisha with additional revenue following the Supreme Court’s recognition of State taxation powers.
Union Government and Mining-Efficiency Arguments
The article argues that the 20 per cent tax now duplicates revenue already obtained through auction premiums of roughly 100 to 120 per cent.
Impact on the public
Opposition and State-Revenue Concerns
Opponents focus on protecting State resources and the revenue authority recognized by the Supreme Court.
Union Government and Mining-Efficiency Arguments
Supporters say excessive and overlapping taxes could increase prices of steel, aluminum, cement, power, and construction materials.
- Original mining law
- The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act was enacted in 1957.
- Auction reform
- A 2015 amendment replaced discretionary allotments with competitive auctions.
- Odisha revenue change
- The article says Odisha’s annual mining revenue rose from Rs 5,000 crore to Rs 50,000 crore.
- ORISED tax
- The Odisha Rural Infrastructure and Socio-Economic Development Act imposed a 20 per cent tax on the annual value of mineral-bearing land.
- High Court ruling
- The Orissa High Court struck down the ORISED Act on December 5, 2005.
- Supreme Court ruling
- In July 2024, the Supreme Court upheld States’ constitutional power to tax mineral rights and allowed retrospective arrears from April 1, 2005.
- Operating auctioned blocks
- The article says 35 of Odisha’s 79 auctioned blocks are currently operational.