Archive · 25 Jul 2025
Supreme Court Slams Journalist Over YouTube Video
The Supreme Court told a journalist from Kerala that you can't convict or acquit someone based on a YouTube video.
The court was upset because the journalist, Nandakumar TP, had a YouTube channel called “Crime Online” and allegedly posted a video that hurt a well-known female politician.
The judges said that the courts, not YouTube videos, decide if someone is guilty or innocent.
They told the journalist to post positive content and extended his temporary release from jail while the case continues.
The Supreme Court criticized a Kerala-based journalist.
The journalist allegedly published a defamatory video on YouTube.
The court stated convictions and acquittals are decided by courts, not YouTube.
The court extended interim bail to journalist Nandakumar TP.
The case involves a prominent woman politician.
- Who
- The Supreme Court and journalist Nandakumar TP.
- What
- The Supreme Court criticized a journalist for a defamatory video on YouTube.
- When
- July 25
- Where
- New Delhi
- Why
- The court was addressing a case involving a defamatory video posted on YouTube.
Journalist's Perspective
Supreme Court's Perspective
Role of YouTube
Journalist's Perspective
Unknown - The articles do not specify.
Supreme Court's Perspective
The court's ruling emphasizes the judiciary's role in determining guilt and innocence.
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Journalist
- Nandakumar TP
- YouTube Channel
- Crime Online
- Location
- Kerala