Archive · 25 Oct 2025
Delhi Court Dismisses Plea Against Ayodhya Judgment, Imposes Costs
A lawyer named Mehmood Pracha tried to get the Supreme Court's decision on the Ayodhya case changed.
He said that the judges were influenced by a religious figure.
The court said his argument didn't make sense and was wasting time.
The court also ordered him to pay a large fine because his case was considered without merit and an abuse of the court.
The judge clarified that seeking guidance from the divine is not a crime and is protected under the law.
Advocate Mehmood Pracha's plea against the Ayodhya judgment was dismissed.
The Delhi District Court labeled the plea as frivolous and an abuse of the judicial process.
Pracha was fined ₹6 lakh in total for the appeal.
The suit was based on comments made by former Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud.
The court clarified that seeking divine guidance does not constitute fraud under the law.
- Who
- Advocate Mehmood Pracha
- What
- Lost an appeal to nullify the 2019 Ayodhya judgment and was fined.
- When
- October 18th
- Where
- Delhi District Court
- Why
- The court found his plea frivolous and an abuse of the judicial process.
- Defendant
- Advocate Mehmood Pracha
- Case
- Plea to nullify the 2019 Ayodhya judgment
- Court
- Delhi District Court (Patiala House Courts)
- Judge
- Dharmender Rana
- Costs Imposed
- ₹6 lakh
- Ruling Date
- October 18th