Archive · 19 Nov 2025
Stock Broking Firms' 'Buy' Ratings: Trustworthiness and Incentives
When big stock broking firms say 'buy', should you trust them?
Not always, says Devina Mehra.
They might not be competent or honest, or they could be pushing an agenda.
Plus, they often say what their bosses or clients want to hear.
Analysts also follow the crowd instead of thinking independently.
Investment bankers care more about how much money they raise than how the stock does later.
And everyone, including regular people, can get carried away and invest too much in hot trends, like NFTs or tulips.
It's not just big companies causing market bubbles.
Large broking firms' 'buy' ratings may not always be reliable
Institutional imperatives influence ratings, leading to skewed recommendations
Research analysts tend to follow consensus views rather than form independent opinions
Investment bankers prioritize deal volume and issue price over post-IPO stock performance
Market bubbles involve 'common' people's willingness to suspend disbelief and invest greedily
- Who
- Stock broking firms, research analysts, investment bankers, and 'common' people
- What
- Give or follow stock ratings and investment advice
- When
- Currently and historically
- Where
- Financial markets worldwide
- Why
- Due to institutional imperatives, herd mentality, and greed
Trust in Ratings
Skepticism of Ratings
Reliability of Ratings
Trust in Ratings
Ratings can be trusted as they come from reputable firms
Skepticism of Ratings
Ratings may be influenced by institutional imperatives and lack of independent thought
- Percentage of 'Buy' or 'Hold' Ratings
- Over 90%
- Percentage of 'Sell' Ratings
- Between 1% and 7%