1 hr ago
Telangana High Court Jails ACP Over Arrest Order Violation
The Telangana High Court had told police not to arrest Katta Vamsi Krishna for a while.
The order was given several times in April 2026.
Police nevertheless arrested Krishna on April 28 while he was in a hospital.
A magistrate saw the court orders and ordered Krishna’s release.
The High Court said ACP A Krishnaiah should have checked whether the protection order had been extended.
The ACP said he acted because of pressure and did not know about the latest order.
The court did not accept that explanation.
It sentenced him to one month in jail and fined him Rs.
2,000.
The sentence was temporarily suspended so the State could appeal.
The Telangana High Court sentenced Saroornagar ACP A Krishnaiah to one month in jail for arresting a protected accused.
The court also imposed a Rs. 2,000 fine for wilfully disobeying its arrest-protection orders.
Katta Vamsi Krishna had received interim protection from arrest on April 21, April 23 and April 27, 2026.
Krishna was arrested on April 28 but released after the magistrate rejected the remand request upon seeing the High Court orders.
The court cleared SI V. Maraiah, while suspending Krishnaiah’s sentence until October 19 so the State could appeal.
- Who
- The Telangana High Court, Saroornagar ACP A Krishnaiah, SI V. Maraiah and petitioner Katta Vamsi Krishna.
- What
- The court sentenced ACP A Krishnaiah for contempt after finding that he disobeyed orders protecting Krishna from arrest.
- Where
- Hyderabad, Telangana, before the Telangana High Court and the jurisdictional magistrate.
- When
- The arrest occurred on April 28, 2026; the contempt order was pronounced on September 18, and the sentence was suspended until October 19.
- Why
- The court found that Krishnaiah arrested Krishna despite knowing of an earlier protection order and failing to verify later extensions.
High Court’s Finding
Police Defense
Whether the arrest violated the order
High Court’s Finding
The court said Krishnaiah knew about the initial protection order and should have checked with the public prosecutor or on the High Court website after learning of its extension.
Police Defense
Krishnaiah said he did not know the protection had been extended and acted under pressure. Police argued that neither Krishna nor his counsel had provided the April 27 order before the arrest.
Whether the disobedience was intentional
High Court’s Finding
The court rejected the explanation as unsatisfactory and treated the failure to verify the orders as disobedience.
Police Defense
Krishnaiah offered an unconditional apology and maintained that the violation was neither intentional nor wilful.
Key facts
- Sentence
- One month in jail for ACP A Krishnaiah
- Fine
- Rs. 2,000, payable within four weeks
- Protected person
- Katta Vamsi Krishna
- Protection orders
- Issued or extended on April 21, April 23 and April 27, 2026
- Arrest date
- April 28, 2026
- Other accused officer
- SI V. Maraiah was cleared of contempt
- Sentence status
- Suspended until October 19 after the State sought time to appeal







