Archive · 10 Sep 2026
Former MLA Seeks Action Against ACP Over Property Dispute
Former MLA Vallabhaneni Vamsi Mohan and lawyer V Devi Satya Sri complained about a police officer.
They said the officer interfered in a disagreement about who could use a piece of land.
Satya Sri said her family bought the land in 2021.
She said a neighbour later objected when they tried to build a wall.
She also said a police case was opened without checking several ownership and boundary documents.
She alleged that her elderly father-in-law was wrongly included as an accused.
Satya Sri said the High Court told police not to interfere in the civil dispute.
The report does not include a response from the accused officer or police department.
Former Gannavaram MLA Vallabhaneni Vamsi Mohan and advocate V Devi Satya Sri complained to NTR District Police Commissioner SV Rajasekhar Babu against ACP Damodar.
Vamsi alleged that police were interfering in Satya Sri’s private property dispute and harassing her despite the matter having no political connection.
Satya Sri said her family bought Plot No 106 in Vijayawada through registered documents in 2021, but a neighbour later challenged construction of a compound wall.
She alleged that Crime No 402/2025 was registered without title documents, ownership papers, an Encumbrance Certificate, boundary measurements or a survey.
Satya Sri alleged that ACP Damodar visited the plot with police personnel on September 8 while she was attending court proceedings; no police response was reported.
- Who
- Former Gannavaram MLA Vallabhaneni Vamsi Mohan and advocate V Devi Satya Sri complained against Central Zone ACP Damodar.
- What
- They sought action over alleged police interference in a private property dispute involving Plot No 106.
- When
- The complaint was submitted on Wednesday; Satya Sri alleged that ACP Damodar visited the plot on September 8, and said Crime No 402/2025 was registered on November 17, 2025.
- Where
- The dispute concerns Plot No 106 in Vijayawada; the complaint was submitted to the NTR District Police Commissioner.
- Why
- They alleged that police intervened in the civil dispute, pressured Satya Sri, and registered cases without adequately verifying property records or boundaries.
Complainants’ Allegations
Police Position Not Reported
Interference in property dispute
Complainants’ Allegations
Vamsi and Satya Sri alleged that ACP Damodar intervened in a private civil dispute, threatened or pressured Satya Sri, and visited the plot with police personnel.
Police Position Not Reported
The report does not provide a response from ACP Damodar or the police department addressing these allegations.
Basis for registering the case
Complainants’ Allegations
Satya Sri alleged that the neighbour had not submitted title documents, ownership papers or an Encumbrance Certificate, and that no boundary verification or survey was conducted before Crime No 402/2025 was registered.
Police Position Not Reported
The report does not state the police’s explanation for registering the case or describe any response to the alleged procedural shortcomings.
Political context
Complainants’ Allegations
Vamsi said cases against him and his associates under the ruling coalition government’s “Red Book” represented political vendetta, while he maintained that Satya Sri’s property dispute was unrelated to politics.
Police Position Not Reported
No opposing political characterization or government response was included in the report.
- Complainants
- Vallabhaneni Vamsi Mohan and advocate V Devi Satya Sri
- Accused officer
- Central Zone ACP Damodar
- Property
- Plot No 106 in Vijayawada
- Purchase year
- Satya Sri’s family purchased the plot through registered documents in 2021.
- Police case
- Crime No 402/2025 was allegedly registered on November 17, 2025.
- Court case
- Satya Sri cited WP No 32225/2025 and alleged that the High Court directed police not to interfere in the civil dispute.
- Police commissioner
- The complaint was submitted to NTR District Police Commissioner SV Rajasekhar Babu.