Archive · 1 Sep 2026
MP Governor Rejects Prosecution Sanction for Minister Vijay Shah
Minister Vijay Shah is facing a case because of remarks he made about Army officer Colonel Sofiya Qureshi.
The remarks were made at a public programme in Madhya Pradesh in May 2025.
The High Court ordered police to register a case.
Shah challenged that order in the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court created a special team to investigate the matter and protected Shah from arrest for the time being.
The investigation is now finished.
The state Cabinet recommended not allowing Shah to be prosecuted, and Governor Mangubhai Patel approved that recommendation.
Because permission was refused, investigators may file a closure report instead of a chargesheet.
Governor Mangubhai Patel approved the Madhya Pradesh Cabinet’s August 25 recommendation denying prosecution sanction for Minister Vijay Shah.
The case concerns Shah’s May 2025 remarks about Indian Army officer Colonel Sofiya Qureshi at a public programme in Mhow.
A Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team completed its probe and sought sanction under Section 196 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
The investigating team said it would file a chargesheet if sanction was granted, or a closure report if it was refused.
Congress leaders led by Umang Singhar have urged the Governor to reconsider, while Shah’s lawyer cited the minister’s apology.
- Who
- Madhya Pradesh Minister Vijay Shah, Governor Mangubhai Patel, the state Cabinet, the Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team, and Congress leaders led by Umang Singhar.
- What
- The Governor approved the Cabinet’s recommendation to deny prosecution sanction against Shah over remarks concerning Colonel Sofiya Qureshi.
- When
- The Cabinet made its recommendation on August 25, and the Governor approved it on Monday night, August 31. Shah’s remarks were made in May 2025.
- Where
- The remarks were made at a public programme in the Mhow area of Indore district, Madhya Pradesh; the case was registered at Manpur police station.
- Why
- The Cabinet cited Shah’s subsequent apologies in recommending that prosecution sanction be denied. The Governor approved that recommendation after the investigation was completed.
Calls for Prosecution
Cabinet’s Denial of Sanction
Whether the case should proceed
Calls for Prosecution
Congress leaders, including Opposition Leader Umang Singhar, have urged the Governor to grant prosecution sanction and reconsider the Cabinet’s decision.
Cabinet’s Denial of Sanction
The Madhya Pradesh Cabinet recommended denying sanction, and Governor Mangubhai Patel approved that recommendation.
Relevance of Shah’s apology
Calls for Prosecution
Shah’s lawyer told the Supreme Court that the minister had apologised and asked the sanctioning authority to consider the apology.
Cabinet’s Denial of Sanction
The Cabinet cited Shah’s apologies when recommending that prosecution sanction be denied.
Governor’s authority
Calls for Prosecution
Vivek Tankha cited a 2004 Supreme Court ruling stating that a Governor may act independently in exceptional circumstances, such as apparent bias, irrationality, or failure to consider relevant material.
Cabinet’s Denial of Sanction
The same precedent stated that a Governor normally acts on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers in prosecution-sanction matters.
- Minister involved
- Kunwar Vijay Shah, Madhya Pradesh Tribal Welfare Minister
- Governor’s decision
- Approved the Cabinet proposal not to grant prosecution sanction
- Cabinet recommendation
- The Cabinet led by Chief Minister Mohan Yadav rejected prosecution sanction on August 25
- Investigation
- A three-member Special Investigation Team completed the probe
- Legal provision
- The SIT sought sanction under Section 196 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
- Next legal step
- The SIT said it would file a chargesheet if sanction was granted and a closure report if it was refused
- Court proceedings
- The Madhya Pradesh High Court took suo motu cognisance on May 14, 2025 and directed registration of an FIR
