Archive · 24 Sep 2026
Election Commission Faces Scrutiny Over Electoral Roll Procedures
A newspaper investigation reported disagreements inside India’s Election Commission.
Two election commissioners allegedly objected to important decisions many times over 10 months.
They reportedly questioned changes to a voter-registration form called Form 6.
They also raised concerns about putting sensitive election data in one central system.
Former election chiefs said some of these actions might be unlawful.
The Election Commission issued a response explaining its position, but the article says it did not directly deny the reported objections.
The disagreement matters because voter lists help decide who can vote.
Critics are calling for more transparency and accountability before more elections take place.
An Indian Express investigation reported at least 14 internal objections by Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi over 10 months.
The objections reportedly concerned changes to Form 6, database centralisation, and decisions allegedly taken without all commissioners’ prior consent.
Former chief election commissioners S.Y. Quraishi and O.P. Rawat questioned the legality of decisions and Form 6 alterations.
The commissioners reportedly approached Cabinet Secretary T.V. Somanathan over software architecture and information-technology integrity concerns.
The report has renewed debate over transparency, voter-roll revisions, and institutional accountability within the Election Commission of India.
- Who
- Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi, Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, former election chiefs, and the Election Commission of India.
- What
- An investigation reported repeated internal objections over electoral-roll procedures, Form 6 changes, database centralisation, and related administrative decisions.
- When
- The reported objections occurred at least 14 times over a 10-month period; the concerns arose during the Special Intensive Revision process.
- Where
- Within the Election Commission of India and in connection with elections across India.
- Why
- Officials and former election commissioners raised concerns about the legality, transparency, and institutional handling of voter-roll and technology-related decisions.
Critics and Former Election Officials
Election Commission Response
Legality of decisions
Critics and Former Election Officials
Former chief election commissioner S.Y. Quraishi said decisions pushed through against the collective will or majority view of the three-member body could be legally suspect or invalid.
Election Commission Response
The Election Commission issued a rebuttal explaining its position, though the article says it did not directly deny the reported objections.
Changes to Form 6
Critics and Former Election Officials
Former chief election commissioner O.P. Rawat described alterations to the statutory voter-registration form as illegal, while the investigation raised concerns about unauthorised modifications.
Election Commission Response
The Election Commission’s reported response offered an explanation of the process but, according to the article, did not provide a direct denial of the reported changes.
Data and technology management
Critics and Former Election Officials
Sandhu and Joshi reportedly objected to centralising sensitive databases and petitioned the Cabinet Secretary over software architecture and information-technology integrity.
Election Commission Response
The Election Commission maintained a rebuttal concerning the reported concerns, but the article does not provide detailed technical counterarguments.
- Reported objections
- At least 14 objections over 10 months
- Officials named
- Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi
- Chief Election Commissioner
- Gyanesh Kumar
- Form under dispute
- Form 6, used to register new voters or modify electoral-roll details
- Former officials’ views
- S.Y. Quraishi questioned decisions contrary to the body’s majority view; O.P. Rawat called Form 6 alterations illegal
- Technical concerns
- Software architecture and information-technology integrity
- Government official approached
- Cabinet Secretary T.V. Somanathan