Archive · 27 Sep 2026
Election Commission Faces Questions Over Voter Roll Decisions
The Election Commission helps decide who can vote.
Two election officials reportedly objected to several decisions about voter lists and registration forms.
The Commission says disagreements are a normal part of its work and that the final decisions were unanimous.
More than 13 crore names were removed from draft voter lists in 30 states and union territories.
Removing a real voter’s name can stop that person from voting.
A voter-registration form was also changed, and two officials questioned how that happened.
The Bharatiya Janata Party called the disagreements healthy, while the Opposition said they showed problems inside the Commission.
The article says the Supreme Court should examine the process carefully so every eligible voter is protected.
A newspaper report documented at least 14 objections by Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi over voter registration, deletions, Form 6, and electoral software.
The Election Commission said such objections were part of normal deliberation and that final decisions were unanimous.
More than 13 crore names were struck from draft electoral rolls across 30 states and union territories during the SIR process.
Changes to Form 6 drew objections because the revised form asked about applicants’ or relatives’ presence on earlier electoral rolls.
The article calls for independent scrutiny of the SIR process, database control, deletions, restorations, and appeals to protect eligible voters.
- Who
- The Election Commission, Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi, the Bharatiya Janata Party, the Opposition, and critics seeking scrutiny of the process.
- What
- Questions have been raised about voter-roll deletions, changes to Form 6, electoral software, and the Election Commission’s impartiality.
- When
- The objections were documented over ten months, and the issue followed a recent newspaper report.
- Where
- The draft-roll deletions occurred across 30 states and union territories; a separate allegation involved Kerala’s former chief secretary.
- Why
- The concerns center on transparency, the protection of voting rights, and public confidence in election administration.
Transparency and Impartiality Concerns
Commission and Government Defense
Meaning of internal objections
Transparency and Impartiality Concerns
Critics say objections involving voter registration, deletions, Form 6, and electoral software require clear explanations, especially where millions of voters may be affected.
Commission and Government Defense
The Election Commission says disagreements are normal deliberation and that its final decisions were unanimous.
Interpretation of Commission differences
Transparency and Impartiality Concerns
The Opposition views the reported differences as evidence of compromised functioning.
Commission and Government Defense
The Bharatiya Janata Party says differences demonstrate healthy deliberation.
Form 6 change
Transparency and Impartiality Concerns
Critics want the Commission to explain who authorised the change and why objections were overridden, with one Commissioner calling it unauthorised and illegal.
Commission and Government Defense
The Commission’s corrective measures indicate that the issue was addressed, though the article argues that corrections do not replace a full explanation.
- Reported objections
- At least 14 objections were documented over ten months.
- Officials named
- Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi.
- Draft-roll deletions
- More than 13 crore names were struck from draft electoral rolls.
- Geographic scope
- The deletions covered 30 states and union territories.
- Disputed form
- Form 6 was changed to ask whether new voters or their parents or grandparents appeared on the last SIR electoral roll.
- Commission position
- The Election Commission described the objections as normal deliberation and said final decisions were unanimous.
- Allegation
- Former Kerala chief secretary Giji Thomson alleged that Gyanesh Kumar offered him a Bharatiya Janata Party ticket; the article says this remains un established.