1 week ago

Delhi Tribunal Awards Rs 56.87 Lakh for Permanent Disability

Delhi Tribunal Awards Rs 56.87 Lakh for Permanent Disability
Delhi tribunal awards Rs 56.87 lakh to man who suffered permanent disability in road accident · theprint.in

Dinesh Kumar was riding his two-wheeler in Delhi when he hit a bus door that suddenly opened.

The bus driver had not checked whether traffic was coming from behind.

Kumar was badly injured in the crash.

His left arm was permanently disabled by 75 per cent.

Because he is left-handed, the injury made everyday tasks and work difficult.

A tribunal decided that the bus driver caused the accident.

It ordered Go Digit General Insurance Company to pay Kumar Rs 56.87 lakh.

The money is meant to help with medical costs, lost earnings and the suffering caused by the injury.

Key facts

Compensation
Rs 56.87 lakh
Injured person
Dinesh Kumar, a 26-year-old security guard
Permanent disability
75 per cent physical disability in the left arm
Accident date
October 27, 2022
Tribunal finding
The accident resulted from the bus driver's rash and negligent act
Award recipient
Go Digit General Insurance Company was directed to deposit the amount
Compensation heads
Loss of future income, medical expenses, physiotherapy, pain and suffering, interest, and loss of marriage prospects

Quotes

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal

The Delhi tribunal deciding Dinesh Kumar’s motor accident compensation claim

“A person is not only to be compensated for the physical injury, but also for the loss which he suffered as a result of such injury. This means that he is to be compensated for his inability to lead a full life, his inability to enjoy those normal amenities which he would have enjoyed but for the injuries, and his inability to earn as much as he used to earn or could have earned.”
theprint.in
“It is clear that the driver of the bus was duty-bound to check the oncoming traffic before opening the door/shutter of battery cover. The driver did not observe any precaution in that regard, and a motorcyclist cannot be expected to presume the sudden opening of the shutter/door of battery cover in moving traffic.”
theprint.in

Sources

Related news