Archive · 9 Jun 2025
Peterson: US Chooses Pakistan's Usefulness Over Democracy
Imagine the U.S. is deciding who to be friends with.
One country, Pakistan, has been helpful in the past.
They let the U.S. use their land for important things, even though they haven't always been fair to their own people.
Another country, India, is very fair and democratic, but the U.S. isn't as close with them.
A Canadian psychologist explains that the U.S. picks friends based on who is most useful, not necessarily who is the 'good guy.'
Pakistan is supported because it gives the U.S. a strategic advantage, even though India is a better democracy.
The expert points out the U.S. is focused on what will bring them the best outcomes.
Dr. Jordan Peterson criticizes U.S. foreign policy in a podcast.
He argues that the U.S. prioritizes strategic access over democratic values.
Pakistan receives aid despite harboring terrorists and suppressing dissent.
India, with its democratic values, receives criticism.
Peterson concludes that 'usefulness trumps righteousness' in U.S. foreign policy.
- Who
- Dr. Jordan Peterson, a Canadian psychologist and cultural critic, discusses U.S. foreign policy. The U.S. and the countries of Pakistan and India are also involved.
- What
- Dr. Jordan Peterson discusses U.S. foreign policy, which prioritizes strategic access over democratic values when dealing with countries like Pakistan.
- When
- The article references events in the 1980s and discusses current U.S. foreign policy.
- Where
- The article discusses U.S. foreign policy concerning Pakistan and India, and draws a comparison.
- Why
- Peterson argues that the U.S. supports Pakistan due to its strategic usefulness, such as providing access and leverage in the region.
Pakistan's Actions
India's Actions
Treatment by the U.S.
Pakistan's Actions
receives billions in aid and weapons
India's Actions
receives scrutiny and pressure
- Main Argument
- U.S. prioritized strategic access
- Pakistan's Actions
- Harbored terrorists, suppressed dissent
- India's Qualities
- Free elections, pluralism, independent courts
- Historical Context
- U.S. armed militants in Pakistan who became the Taliban
- Peterson's Conclusion
- Global superpowers calculate and invest based on returns