2 days ago
Supreme Court Allows Rajasthan Cricket Poll, Blocks Result Declaration
The Rajasthan Cricket Association was scheduled to hold an election.
A former woman cricketer told the Supreme Court that no women could vote or run as candidates.
She asked the court to stop the election.
The Supreme Court decided that the election could happen.
However, it said the result could not be announced.
The court also asked the Rajasthan High Court to decide a related case.
The High Court had appointed a government official to oversee the association.
The petitioner may also raise the issue in a separate cricket administration case before the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court allowed the Rajasthan Cricket Association election to proceed on September 29.
The court ordered that the election result must not be declared.
The order followed a petition alleging there was no female voter or candidate.
The bench asked the Rajasthan High Court to decide a related pending plea.
The Rajasthan High Court had appointed a Rajasthan government official as RCA administrator.
- Who
- The Supreme Court, a former woman cricketer, the Rajasthan Cricket Association, and the Rajasthan High Court were involved.
- What
- The Supreme Court allowed the RCA election but barred declaration of its result.
- Where
- The matter was heard by the Supreme Court in New Delhi; it concerned the Rajasthan Cricket Association.
- When
- The election was scheduled for September 29, with voting beginning at 11:30 a.m.
- Why
- The order addressed concerns raised about women’s representation in the election and a related case pending before the Rajasthan High Court.
Petitioner’s Position
Court’s Procedural Position
Whether the election should proceed
Petitioner’s Position
The petitioner sought a stay, arguing that women’s representation was absent because no woman was allowed to contest and there was reportedly no female voter.
Court’s Procedural Position
The Supreme Court declined to stop the election, but protected the issue by preventing the result from being declared.
How the dispute should be handled
Petitioner’s Position
The petitioner asked for the matter to be tagged with the pending Board of Control for Cricket in India case and suggested placing the result in a sealed cover.
Court’s Procedural Position
The Supreme Court directed the Rajasthan High Court to decide the related pending plea and gave the petitioner permission to approach the pending BCCI matter.
Key facts
- Court order
- The election could proceed, but its result could not be declared.
- Election date
- September 29
- Scheduled start
- 11:30 a.m.
- Petitioner’s concern
- The petitioner said there was no female voter or candidate.
- Related court
- Rajasthan High Court
- Administrator
- The High Court appointed the additional chief secretary of Rajasthan’s home department as RCA administrator.
- Further legal option
- The petitioner was allowed to move an application in the pending Board of Control for Cricket in India matter.
Quotes
Supreme Court bench
The Supreme Court bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana.
“Having regard to the issues raised by the petitioner, especially of women’s representation in the Rajasthan Cricket Association (RCA), we direct that the election, which is scheduled to take place today, will take place. However, the result shall not be declared.”
theprint.in







