Archive · 1 Dec 2025
Supreme Court Reverses Governor Bill Assent Timelines
The Supreme Court of India recently made a big decision about how governors handle bills passed by state governments.
Earlier, in April 2025, a smaller group of judges had said governors must approve or reject bills within a certain time.
But now, a larger group of judges has said there's no fixed time for governors to approve bills.
This means governors can take as long as they want, which some people think gives them too much power.
The article argues that governors should be elected by the states, not appointed by the central government, to make the system more democratic.
It suggests that governors should be chosen by the state assembly and local bodies, similar to how the President of India is elected.
Supreme Court reversed April 2025 judgment on governor's bill assent timelines.
Governors can now take indefinite time to assent to bills, effectively vetoing them.
Governors are appointed by the Centre, leading to potential conflicts with state governments.
Proposal suggests governors should be elected by state assemblies and local bodies.
Current system undermines federalism and democratic principles.
- Who
- Supreme Court of India, Governors, State Governments
- What
- Reversal of timelines for governor's assent to bills
- When
- November 20, 2025
- Where
- India
- Why
- To address the governor's power to veto bills by not assenting
- Date of Supreme Court Ruling
- November 20, 2025
- Governor's Role
- Appointed by the Centre, can veto bills by not assenting
- April 2025 Judgment
- Set timelines for governor to clear bills
- November 2025 Ruling
- Reversed April 2025 judgment, no fixed time frame for assent
- Proposed Governor Election
- Elected by state assembly and local bodies