8 months ago

BRS and Congress Clash Over Speaker's Verdict

BRS and Congress Clash Over Speaker's Verdict
BRS leaders minted money instead of serving people, fumes Srinivas · thehansindia.com

There was a big argument between the BRS and Congress parties in Telangana.

The Speaker of the Legislative Assembly made a decision about some MLAs who might have switched parties.

The BRS MLAs said the Speaker's decision was unfair and they plan to fight it in court.

They also said the Congress party is being hypocritical because they have done the same thing in the past.

The Congress party, on the other hand, said the Speaker's decision was fair and that the BRS MLAs are just upset because they didn't get what they wanted.

Both parties are accusing each other of not following the rules.

Key facts

Speaker
Gaddam Prasada Kumar
BRS MLAs Involved
KP Vivekananda, K Sanjay
Congress Leader
Adi Srinivas
Chief Minister
A Revanth Reddy
BRS's Legal Plan
Approach the High Court
Congress's Accusation
BRS's history of defections
BRS's Allegation
Congress violating anti-defection rules

Quotes

T Harish Rao

Former Minister and BRS party leader

“The Congress government led by Chief Minister Revanth Reddy has stooped down to the level of degrading constitutional institutions for political gain.”
thehansindia.com
“In this incident, which severely undermined democratic principles, the Congress government has committed a constitutional violation, he slammed.”
thehansindia.com

KP Vivekananda

BRS MLA from Quthbullapur

“The Speaker’s judgment now reflects the Chief Minister’s words from that time. People are laughing at the Speaker’s verdict. The MLAs, who defected, openly campaigned for the Congress party-backed sarpanch candidates. The BRS party will not remain silent. It will pursue a legal battle.”
thehansindia.com
“Even after the Supreme Court made strong remarks, a proper judgment was not delivered. The judgment was given only regarding five individuals. When asked about the remaining five, no proper answer was given. The Supreme Court said that action should be taken if the proceedings are prolonged. Despite notices being issued to Kadiam Srihari and Danam Nagender, they did not respond. They should be disqualified. When we asked for a copy of the judgment, it was not given to us. We were told it would be uploaded soon. An attempt is being made to mislead the court by superficially claiming that a judgment has been delivered. They must explain the grounds on which the petition was dismissed. With what face will the MLAs who joined the Congress party go before the people? If Chief Minister Revanth Reddy has the courage, he should make 10 MLAs resign and face the by-elections. Today’s Speaker’s decision is the result of the BRS party’s struggle. We will definitely approach the High Court and wage a legal battle.”
thehansindia.com

K. Sanjay

BRS MLA

“The judgment had already been decided at the Jubilee Hills Palace, and the order copy came from there. Our defected MLAs claimed they were sitting next to Congress members because the treasury benches were closer to the toilet. The Speaker delivered a unilateral verdict without considering our arguments. The Speaker’s conduct is against the Constitution. We will study the judgment copy and approach the High Court.”
thehansindia.com

Adi Srinivas

Government Whip and spokesperson

“We strongly condemn the BRS MLAs for making personal attacks against the Speaker. It is surprising that the BRS party is speaking about defections. Have they forgotten bringing TDP MLA Talasani Srinivas Yadav into the Cabinet? Have they forgotten including Congress MLA Sabitha Indra Reddy in the Cabinet? Have they also forgotten that the BRS absorbed 39 opposition MLAs into its ranks over the last 10 years? During the past decade, even when the opposition complained about defections, the Speakers did not take any action.”
thehansindia.com

Sources

Related news